Transition

Editor;

A good starting point for implementing positive change and ending Bangkok’s grip on power would be acceptance of Anand Panyarachun’s fair-minded recommendation that local administrative bodies be given increased autonomy and authority to determine what works best for and within their village communities. The National Reform Committee has called for decentralised, cooperative local decision-making regarding economic, social, political and security matters. Truly representative democratically elected leaders should also be primarily responsible for prioritizing and running their own affairs, including overseeing local police, operating community schools and managing natural resources in their rural areas. There is an urgent need for a system-wide overhaul, especially in the aloof, Bangkok-centric Interior and Education ministries, in order to increase community-based autonomy and relegate out-of-touch, imposed work responsibilities. The aim should be to promote people’s independence, yielding to those most involved in day-to-day self-determination of relevant issues.

Community schools foster effective, strong partnerships, sharing accountability for mutually agreed-upon results, serving as human-service magnets to look after and care for the welfare of rural villagers related to physical, mental, spiritual, emotional and behavioural health issues, family support, youth activities and community development projects. They aim to help promote a social climate that is secure and supportively respectful, where there is mutual, effective collaboration among parents, families and school staff to motivate and engage civic-minded learners, instilling self-confident dignity. Budget-allocation priorities should balance longstanding inequities where those with the greatest needs receive the least help. “What’s in it for me?” mindsets should yield to “What’s best for the common good?” A leaner, cleaner, keener MOE should transfer redundant, inactive positions back into the classroom, changing from top-downslide authoritarianism to encourage bottoms-up, what-matters-most self-determination instead. The prerequisite is relinquishing vested interest, favoured control through increased community-based autonomy. Why not?!

 Chanchai Prasertson

Buoys disintegrating

Editor;

Last year around October 2010, a great safe idea was to put large florescent buoys around 100 meter areas in Jomtien and Pattaya beaches so swimmers could enjoy safe swimming and playing without any type of thrill craft, tour or fishing boat entering the swimmers area. They did keep the areas safe, but are now unsafe to all.

The problem being the manufacture did not build these buoys strong enough to handle the moods of Mother Nature and now they are breaking up.

We have learned that there is a 2 year guarantee on these buoys, but who is going to clean up this horrible mess and in the meantime? All sizes of foam and heavy gauge bits of plastic are breaking and leaching out of these buoys every hour.

The Pollution Solution Group feels that the manufacture of these units are responsible for the breaking up and spewing foam and plastic all over our beaches and ocean and should send out a crew to remove, starting yesterday and daily until the problem is solved. I’m sure that the manufacture has now mastered a better way to build these buoys or to be open for suggestions as we have heard many better and safer ways to build them.

Gerry Rasmus

Transition

Buoys disintegrating