|
Money matters: Is Old Best? Not Necessarily So Part 3
Graham Macdonald
MBMG International Ltd.
Many well respected underwriters placed their own syndicates’
reinsurances with the spiral syndicates. They believed that, although the spiral
syndicates themselves were doomed to disaster, their own syndicates as
policyholders would not suffer. Lloyd’s and its Central Fund would stand behind
every contract. The widening conspiracy of silence, however, ensured that new
names were never informed. It was insider trading with a difference; insider
trading at its most cynical ... Unknown to external names on such syndicates as
162, 317 and 843 who underwrote the policies, a number of working names were
able to effect personal stop loss policies at very low, preferential rates and
with guaranteed annual renewals at those same rates. Some of the cover provided
went as high as 100% of the individual’s total underwriting, making membership
of Lloyd’s for those favoured few a one-way bet. They could not lose. Only the
external names could.
Wow!
Now I don’t claim to know the ins and outs of insurance, re-insurance or
underwriting but I can recognise that clearly there are people out there who
have grievances and who don’t feel that they have been fairly treated during
their membership of Lloyds. It’s impossible for someone whose expertise in this
field is as limited as mine to comment on this but I do know that there’s no way
that any of my money would go anywhere near such a complicated and opaque
investment.
However, I understand accounts and yet Lloyds and its members seem to spurn
accounts that are unfathomable, allegedly inaccurate or, in many cases, no
accounts at all. One allegation is that evidences believed to have been
uncovered by an Association of US names indicate that despite the practices
being forbidden by its own trust deed, the American Dollar Trust Fund has
regularly loaned and borrowed funds.
The website mentions other scandals such as the Sasse and Savonita affairs where
it’s alleged that Lloyd’s paid the policyholders’ claims in full even though it
had evidence which proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the claims were
fraudulent and that organized crime was heavily involved. It also makes
reference to Lloyd’s complicity in the delay of processing the necessary legal
papers for the enforced return of Peter Cameron Webb and Peter Dixon to the UK
to stand trial for theft and fraud at Lloyd’s and it adds that, “In addition
there are a number of other well recorded instances where Lloyd’s failed to take
appropriate action for the investigation or prosecution of criminal activities.”
There are also some suggestions that there may have been something inappropriate
in the nature and amount of the Piper Alpha oil rig claim. Is this all in the
past? Not according to the Names Defence Association, “Although Lloyd’s issued
new byelaws in early 1995 concerning the appointment and regulation of managers
of syndicates in run-off, it has not addressed the underlying problems and
present ongoing abuses which may, even now, be worse than ever. Members of
syndicates in run-off are the victims of outrageous practices which Lloyd’s
regulators ignore and which some advisers suspect may be contrary to agency
contracts and to Lloyd’s bye laws ... Names’ deposits have been drawn-down and
Central Fund withdrawals have been ordered by those run-off managers and by
members agencies for sums for which there was no lawful justification ...
Certain members of the Names Defence Association and their personal advisers
have been endeavouring to exercise their rights of inspection of the syndicate
books and records to ascertain whether such further abuses have in fact
occurred. So far, no such rights of inspection have been honoured by the
Agencies concerned.”
I have to state again that we have no way of knowing the rights & wrongs, ins
and outs, ups and downs or goods, bads or uglies of any of this. Some folks
might. They might be the ones who can make money out of this. If we can’t, then
we assume that most people can’t and therefore that they shouldn’t be risking
their money on something that seems so risky and where so many other seemingly
extremely smart people have lost so much money in the past.
However, recently we were asked to look at the London Nominees Portfolio 2007.
This is a closed-ended 8-year fund that will deposit up to 40% of its investment
monies with Lloyd’s to secure 100% participation in Lloyd’s insurance syndicates
via a Nameco - The London Nominees Portfolio 2007 (UK) Ltd., a limited liability
UK company that will obtain capacity acquisitions in Lloyd’s syndicates on the
Fund’s behalf. Each participation in a Lloyd’s syndicate will be made on a
one-year basis (the balance of the monies shall be invested with the fund
manager, Absolute Asset Management, for them to invest in Foreign Exchange
Trading, and Global Macro Trading).
We would absolutely avoid any exposure to this for the reasons stated above. Our
only way of quantifying the risk here would be that all the investment capital
is 100% at risk from day one and we have no idea what the returns might or might
not be. There was a time when there was a certain cache to being a Lloyds name -
having read the diatribe of the NDA, I don’t think that any of my hard-earned
cash could be justified for whatever remaining gloss there may be attached to
being a name by proxy!
If you want access to any more of the voluminous research that we’ve done into
this subject, please don’t hesitate to contact us, but we’ll spare the majority
of our readers the next few hundred pages of this!
|
The above data and research was compiled from sources believed to be
reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its officers can accept
any liability for any errors or omissions in the above article nor bear any
responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any actions taken or not
taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For more information please
contact Graham Macdonald on [email protected]
|
Snap Shots: Family fotos
can be fun
by Harry Flashman
Unless
you are a dyed in the wool ornithologist, it is most likely that the
majority of photographs you take are of family members, including the
height of difficulty, grandparents, parents and children all in one
shot. This week I hope to be able to assist you in getting better
pictures, ones that you will want to enlarge and hang on the wall.
For everyone with a bunch of relatives, photographs are the ideal record
to show a growing family, from naked on the bunny rug, to first
communion, to marriage. Every family has these shots. A source of joy
for grandmothers and a source of embarrassment for young teenagers!
To get better shots is not the result of better equipment, a box brownie
would be satisfactory, but with today’s digital compacts being the
common camera, they will be just fine. What I am talking about here is
photographic technique, not the photographic technical details. So make
sure there is enough memory on the card and let’s go!
Take the thorny problem of children first. It is my experience that all
children are a problem, and photographing them even more so! In fact I
actively dislike taking kiddypix, but you have got to take them. The
problem comes in the fact that children have an attention span measured
in seconds, while teenagers have an attention span that can be measured
in nano-seconds, unless they ‘want’ the photograph, whereupon they spend
all the time hogging the limelight.
Rule 1 is then to set up the shot you want, before children are brought
into it. This does mean you have to ‘see’ the shot you want and then
make it happen. Since the child is the important subject, select an area
with a blank background. You do not want a cluttered, busy background to
take the attention away from the child. Generally, a wall works well,
particularly if you position the subject as far away from the background
as possible. In this way, even with point and shoot compacts, when you
focus on the child, the background will not be in sharp clear focus too.
Try for neutral colorings too. A grey wall is better than a white one.
The next most important thing with kids is to get down to their level.
You will not get a great shot looking down at them while they squint up
to look at you. The camera should not be higher than the subject’s face
when taking good kiddypix, so bend at the knees and get down to their
level.
Only now, bring on the junior ‘stars’ and start shooting – fast! Move in
close so that the head and shoulders fill the frame. Don’t worry if you
crop into the hair – just get close. More shots are spoiled by being to
far away, rather than the reverse.
Now let’s look at photographing the older members of the family.
Grandparents. Nobody wants to see themselves as dried prunes. If Mum and
Dad are really getting on a bit, then consider using a soft focus filter
to just soften those crows feet just a little. I refuse to use the term
‘laughing lines’ as I believe they are not a laughing matter! And don’t
shoot prunes!
So you’ve only got a compact and can’t screw a soft focus filter on –
don’t worry, stretch a piece of nylon stocking tightly across the front
of the camera and it will work OK. Fortunately, parents do have an
attention span that can be measured by standard wrist watches, so you
can try placing them in different areas of the garden for different
effects. As people getting on in years tend to have white hair, look for
darker backgrounds as contrast.
Think too, about getting the older folk to sit down. Comfortable garden
chairs are good, but place them together and slightly facing each other.
You do not want the “sit up straight” school pictures look with 75 year
old grand-parents. And get down to their level too. Move in close, let
them fill the frame and see if you haven’t got a great shot out of that
afternoon’s photography session.
Modern Medicine: Genetic engineering providing more hope
by Dr. Iain Corness, Consultant
As soon as you mouth the words “genetic engineering” there
are people who will throw their hands in the air, decrying it as immoral,
illegal or even fattening. This is not the case, however. Genetic
engineering is nothing to do with attempting to produce a “super race” which
has three heads, eight legs and is a pale shade of green. Genetic
engineering in the human is an attempt to repair genetic defects at the
root. Turn defective genes into normal ‘healthy’ ones.
Take families in which asthma runs genetically through its members, or
diabetes or epilepsy. Imagine taking the ‘asthma’ or ‘diabetes’ gene and
replacing it with a ‘healthy’ gene. Suddenly, the scourge of that family has
gone. The following generations are ailment free. Surely something to aim
for.
Ever since we began to crack the mystery of the human genome, there have
been high hopes that we will be able to predict those who are going to have
problems by examining their genetic make-up. Professor John Shine, the
executive director of the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Australia
recently said, “You will be able to take a blood test and it will show that
you are the one who will have a heart attack unless you reduce cholesterol
and change your lifestyle.”
In this new report, Professor Shine and nine other leading Australian
researchers have predicted what they believe will be the medical
breakthroughs of the future. By the turn of the century, they forecast,
doctors will be able to repair bad combinations of genes to avoid disease,
grow new body parts to replace damaged organs and reconnect wiring in
damaged spinal columns. Genetics would also lead to new treatments for
obesity and diabetes, Professor Shine said.
There was also an announcement last week that researchers had found a new
marker for identifying aggressive prostate cancers. The discovery would
allow the development of individual treatment plans tailored to the level of
aggression of the disease, he said.
And far from reducing humanity to a genetic sequence, the mapping of the
human genome and stem cell research held the most promise for developments
that will aid the prevention and treatment of disease.
A report, Then, Now ... Imagine, compiled by Research Australia, and
released this month, tracks scientific breakthroughs from the polio vaccine
to treatments for bipolar disorder, the development of microsurgery and the
discovery of DNA. The future will hold, according to this research group:
New body parts for those with diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s,
diabetes and multiple sclerosis.
Drugs to target cancer at the source.
New vaccines for HIV, hepatitis C and type 1 diabetes.
New nerve pathways to rewire damaged spinal columns and stimulate nerve
re-growth.
Operating before birth to correct abnormalities.
Now whilst this was crystal ball gazing, it is futurology based on current
knowledge, and nothing to do with Burmese astrologers, as used by the
deposed ex-PM.
We have discovered the “cancer gene” for breast cancer and some types of
colorectal cancers and another condition called familial adenomatous
polyposis, which if left untreated, results in 100 percent of the cases
developing colon cancer. So what are we doing about it?
What you have to understand is that this gene identification is not the be
all and end all of the cancer story. The relative contributions to cancer
are as follows:
Dietary 35 percent
Smoking 30 percent
Hereditary factors 5-10 percent
Occupational exposure 5 percent
Infectious agents 5 percent
Radiation and environmental pollution 4 percent
(And yes, I do realize that doesn’t add up to 100 percent - there are
others, but small numbers.)
What the gene is indicating, is the ‘susceptibility’ towards developing
cancer. Just because someone in your family got breast cancer, that does not
mean that you will. Their cancer might have had nothing to do with genetic
mutations of healthy genes. There is a far greater chance that it developed
from “other” causes such as smoking, for example.
However, returning to the hereditary concept, if after taking a detailed
family history it looks as if there “might” be a genetic element, then it is
a case of very extensive testing – that takes much time (and money) to see
if the person has the mutated gene.
The next problem for the predictive testing concept is – if you find you
have got the mutated gene – what do you do about it? And even more
importantly, can you handle the knowledge?
Heart to Heart with Hillary
Dear Hillary,
Further to your reply to ‘Browned Off’ you say that in America they are even
drawing up Pre-Nuptial agreements BUT these already exist in Thailand and I
advise all Farangs to look beyond the end of their you know what and the
bottom of the beer bottle and get a good lawyer to draw one up for them
before tying the knot. The first and main clause states that any assets,
property, etc., owned by either partner before the marriage remains their
individual property in the event of splitting up (divorcing, etc). Other
clauses are optional - I had one included that stated that I would never be
considered the head of her family, nor liable for any debts, expenses, etc.
incurred by any member of this family, nor responsible for housing any of
them. This agreement was prepared by my lawyer and signed by us both and
witnessed by two Thais. We each have one copy and a third was deposited with
the Registrar of marriages. Cost to me was 5,000 baht - a worthwhile
investment I am sure you will agree.
A thoughtful Farang
Dear A thoughtful Farang,
Aren’t you the thoughtful one, my Petal. You have been thinking all the way
along for ‘Number 1’ and never once could you be considered guilty of a
glance of compassion in the direction of your wife’s needs. You may not want
to get involved with her family, but I am sure you have involved her in
yours, showing off what a beautiful wife you managed to score! Have you
never stopped to think that there are cultural and family traditions and
responsibilities that your wife has to live up to as well? After all, this
country is called Thailand, and the local inhabitants are called Thai.
Sounds to me you should have signed off as A Thoughtless Farang! I had
always thought that the whole reason for living together was sharing life
together, but it seems I have an old fashioned viewpoint, and certainly not
one shared by your good self.
Just as an aside, can you read Thai? Any legal document in this country must
be written in Thai, or it is worthless. Are you sure that what you think was
in the document actually is they way you imagine? English ‘translations’ can
be obtained to make the foreigner happy, but the document (in English) has
no legal standing. I have also never heard of the Amphur office filing
documents for pre-nuptial agreements, but then again, I could be wrong once
more.
Dear Hillary,
I have enjoyed reading your column for the past twelve years. Sometimes with
laughter and other times with skepticism at how naive some adults appear to
be. Surely from the age bracket (40-60 years) of expatriates in Thailand
that I have witnessed, one would assume that common sense would come into
play.
Many of your articles are written on the so called all-preying bar girl, who
somehow always manages to deceive some poor unsuspecting soul out of his
very life savings. This intrigues me as to how these mental giants made it
to this age bracket in the first place!
Let’s see how this plays out. Man, above age bracket, maybe balding, beer
belly, possibly divorced, heard about the young Thai girls and decides this
is the place for him! Girl, “Hello Big Sexy Man! Come in, come in! Where are
you from! My, what a nice personality (wallet size), buy me a drink!” Now is
she to be blamed for his thinking with the little head. Once again common
sense!
There are many beautiful ladies in Thailand and I believe that the world has
the wrong impression. Most of the women that I have had the pleasure of
meeting are looking for “Mr. Right” regardless of age. But in the bars, I
think not.
I, like many others both male and female have also been burnt, but not from
a Thai lady. I have been happily married to a lady that is nineteen years my
junior. We have two adopted children, our home and a successful business.
Life started over for me with the help of my Beautiful Thai Lady. When life
hands you lemons, make lemonade!
Happy in T’land
Dear Happy in T’land,
You have hit the nail on its little head, fair and square, my Petal. Would
you go into a bakers shop and expect to find beef steaks? Would you go into
a hardware shop and expect to find imported cheeses? Of course not, but the
Mr. Wrongs (balding, beer belly, divorced) you describe so well, hang around
the beer bars, expecting a well educated, bilingual beauty contest winner,
who is waiting just for them, and no other. I’m sorry, but they’ve gone to
the wrong shop again. There are many Thai ladies, as you have also said,
looking for a Mr. Right, but these Thai ladies aren’t working from a bar
stool, saying “Hello sexy man! Come in please!” You are much more likely to
find these kind of ladies working in a profession somewhere. I am also glad
that life began anew for you, with your own special Thai lady. Best of luck
with the lemonade stall, perhaps you could franchise it to some the Mr.
Wrongs!
A Female Perspective: Those teenage years
with Sharona Watson
What is it about our little babies that when they reach a certain age, they
seem to become self-obsessed and never pay attention to anything but
themselves? What happened to my scrumptious little daughter who was always
sweetness and light and is suddenly prone to violent swings in temperament
and wears a permanent scowl whenever she’s around her parents? I’m not even
sure I should be writing this because she’ll be furious when she sees it and
she’ll start flapping the newspaper around the room, shouting and screaming
at me. Actually, to be fair, she doesn’t shout and scream, rant and rave.
She’s kind of quiet but has dark penetrating eyes which often say more than
words could ever do.
Teenage
angst in action.
Anyway, often when she does say something nowadays it’s just the one
syllable, uttered with varying levels of contempt and usually borrowed from
the latest useless film about ‘teenage angst’. Whatever the words are, they
are more like monkey noises than anything else. ‘Derr!’ is a popular one
just now, which can be used it appears, in any situation, at any time and in
any place. I take it that I am meant to infer from its use that I am stupid.
‘Er, no!’ is another, which means firstly that I should have realised
something was very obvious and secondly, even more blatantly, that she isn’t
going to do whatever I asked her.
‘What-ever’ is a ‘Mummy, you’re boring me, I don’t care, so just go away and
leave me alone!” response which can be very annoying. I have never liked the
‘I know better than you’ or ‘there’s nothing you can teach me’ attitudes
that I see so often in the way that men (sometimes) treat women. The last
thing I want to see is that kind of nonsense coming into my house.
On rare occasions, I have even been dealt a straightforward, ‘Oh, will you
please just shut up?’ which normally requires some action on my part. I
understand what’s going on of course, but I cannot have disrespect being
thrown at me. She can be going through all the teenage traumas she wants but
there are some things which stay the same. Respect for parents is one of
these things.
Having said that, it’s probably best to look on the funny side, even when it
can feel exhausting constantly having to deal with teenage troubles. For
instance, for certain occasions I will adopt ‘teenage’ language, especially
when I know it will embarrass my daughter.
Then there are those plentiful mornings, when a question such as, “What
would you like for breakfast, my love?” is met by the snappy response, “Oh,
leave me alone!” Then there’s the “What do you want from me?” abruptness
when all I have done is ask whether she has everything she needs for school.
And when some catastrophe happens like her little sister has borrowed her
Barbie’s that she doesn’t use anymore, it’s “Oh My Gosh!” At least she
doesn’t blaspheme.
“Good for you” is meant to diminish me when I try to explain that I seem to
spend most of my time cleaning up the various belongings which have been
scattered around the house. And when she’s too lazy to say one of the above,
she just grunts “Uh Huh”.
Other favourite monosyllables are the emphatic “No!” and the almost insolent
“So?” I’m relieved that swearing hasn’t crept in yet, although I can’t
answer for what happens outside our home; I just hope she has enough
self-respect not to use foul language all the time. The “Tut” she has down
to a fine art. It’s not quite the teeth-kissing thing that you used to hear
in London everywhere, but it can be heard quite a lot in the mornings and
evenings especially. “Dunno” is used quite regularly too, a nice way for her
to avoid the pain of having to think about something.
The funny thing is that teenagers don’t seem to realize (or are just not
interested in the fact) that we were teenagers once as well and actually, it
wasn’t that long ago. So I can empathize and I can sympathize and maybe now
I’m wondering the same things that my mother thought about, when she was
bringing me and my sisters up. I don’t know how my mother managed, with four
girls. Actually I do; we all left home of our own volition when we were
eleven. But that’s another story. I feel sorrier for my husband’s parents
who had four boys. Can you imagine? Five boys including his Dad and typical
males besides. Obviously I’ve managed to knock a bit of shape into Andy now,
but the stories I hear from his Mum about what he used to get up to! It must
have been a nightmare!
I guess it’s something to do with growing up that teenagers start thinking
about their parents and probably the whole world in a different way. They
start questioning what they are being told as they find the boundaries for
themselves. I think this is a very necessary and good part of growing up and
if it is looked after carefully, it can really help a person develop. They
become more critical, so if you can help them to justify some of their
arguments and allow yourself as a parent to be persuaded sometimes, then
everyone must be a winner. Teenage years are by no means all bad, of course.
Last year, I was very proud of my daughter when she stood up for her rights
as a student in her school. She could have said nothing and the class would
have carried on doing nothing, but she didn’t. I thought that was a very
mature and strong thing to do; she recognized that it was her right to be
educated, she wanted to learn but felt that this was being denied to her.
“That’s my girl” I thought. Then, there’s the pleasure of watching my
beautiful girl turn into an even more beautiful woman, becoming more and
more independent everyday and learning new things all the time about places,
people and things. I love her more than I can say.
Next week: I dreamed last night…
[email protected]
Learn to Live to Learn: Going to the dogs
by Andrew Watson
Over the past few weeks, I have been focusing on what I regard as a
fundamental imperative of education in general and international education
in particular; to encourage, nurture and develop the capacity in people to
‘act locally, think globally’. One of the problems of extolling some
grandiose ideology is putting the rhetoric into practice. Thus, I was
delighted and reassured in equal measure recently when I met an individual
who puts their passion for caring into practice and by her personal example,
illustrates how perhaps we can all live up to lofty idealism.
Toni
Hayden – caring for her kittens.
Toni Hayden, from Essex in the UK, is a Year 2 teacher at Garden
International School. She became “fed up” with seeing stray dogs with
suppurating open wounds of pus and blood, scratching their skin off,
sometimes starving and getting hit by cars in and around Ban Chang, where
she lives. “It breaks my heart,” she revealed. So what did she do? She did
something about it. Instead of whingeing about a problem, she went in search
of a solution.
“Somebody told me about ‘Soi Dog Rescue’ in Bangkok (www.soidogrescue.org)
so I wrote to Sheridan Conisbee (president and co-founder) and asked if they
could come and help out down here. But they were just way too busy. They’ve
got thousands and thousands of dogs to deal with in Bangkok.” But they gave
Toni hope, encouragement and contacts, “It was clear that there were quite a
few other people who had written to her from around here saying the same
kind of thing.” Some of those people were part of another organisation
called ‘Dog Chance’, founded by Khun Pym <www.dogchance.com>. It was an
ideal opportunity to pool resources and ideas.
Toni’s persuasive, gentle compassionate enthusiasm was reminding me of
something I had read recently by Abraham Maslow, management guru and the
‘Father of Third Force Psychology’ (also known as ‘humanist psychology’), a
philosophy to help recognize and develop the human capacity for compassion,
creativity, ethics, love, spirituality, and other uniquely human traits.
With boundless enthusiasm and despite being somewhat limited by the hours of
the school day, Toni joined up with ‘Dog Chance’ and the Navy at the Naval
base in Sattahip where they have built a Dog rescue centre. Vets and
volunteers from Bangkok to Rayong came together for a session of mass
neutering; 100 dogs in a weekend. That’s a lot of scissors. Whilst the vets
did the cutting, Toni and the other volunteers looked after pre-op and
post-op care, which included dressing the dogs’ wounds; real hands on stuff.
How had the dogs come to be at the centre in the first place? I thought. I
mean, it’s not like you can just put a sign up, is it? “The Navy had to
drive around the day before to catch them,” explained Toni patiently. “Like
humans, the dogs must not have eaten for twelve hours before the operation.”
It became obvious that there’s a whole logistical aspect to collecting the
dogs, caring for them and “getting to know them” before they are neutered.
There are obvious dangers. How did Toni feel about dealing with mange ridden
dogs and possibly rabies? “My biggest worry was catching Mange.” (You can do
that?) Mange (from the French) is a skin disease in hairy and woolly
animals, caused by a parasitic mite which lives under the skin. (yuk!) Toni
described it as ‘really contagious’ although I read elsewhere that it is
only occasionally communicated to humans. On the other hand, I suppose the
more contact you have with mangy dogs, the more likely “the dog version of
scabies” will burrow under your skin. Happily, it’s treatable.
What about rabies? Has she been vaccinated? “Er, no.” she says sheepishly.
“I should have but I don’t like needles. I think most of the volunteers
would have had the injection. But you can get an injection up to twenty four
hours after being bitten.” Rather courageously, this doesn’t prevent Toni
from vaccinating dogs against rabies. “I ‘scrub up’ and I ‘scrub down’.”
I’ve got a little bunny rabbit at home so I am terrified that I’m going to
give something to her. I was thinking “Oh dear. A combination platter;
myxomatosis, rabies and mange. Tremendous.” My squeamishness wouldn’t have
been tolerated by Toni, so I kept quiet. Actually, I was learning a great
deal from her, about courage and devotion in particular.
Nonetheless, “It was a bit of a baptism of fire for me,” Toni admits. “I
learned so much. I was showed how to muzzle - you can’t muzzle them until
you’ve got a lead on (I had visions of a lasso) – then you have to befriend
them. “The dogs were really friendly up until the moment they were to be
injected.” Now the dogs have been neutered, Toni wants to see if she can get
the dogs adopted. Understandably, space is at a premium at the rescue centre
and there’s a need to establish some kind of turnover.
Bringing the concept of care for animals to the school has been a natural
progression for Toni; she started an after-school club to that end. It’s
perfect ‘CAS’ material. “But I had way more volunteers than I could take.
However, in the long run I would definitely like to get more and more
students involved.”
One day she found a box of kittens less than two weeks old that someone had
abandoned. With a heart like Toni’s, she couldn’t just leave them alone.
Cynics might ask, “Why bother with the cats and dogs?” Toni’s answer is
immediate, “I can’t bear to see the suffering - living in pain.” She is a
passionate believer in the role of education in helping people to change
their view of sterilisation. It’s a ‘no brainer’ of course. The more dogs
that are neutered, the less dogs we’ll have around and the greater the
chances of them being healthy. It may be a dog’s life, but Toni Hayden
really cares.
Next week: Maslow- the man’s a genius
[email protected]

Toni Hayden and friends; care in the community.
|