pattayamail.gif (2145 bytes)
 



















LETTERS

  HEADLINES [click on headline to view story]: 
 
Why the Thai Tourism Industry needs to support cable TV

Barking dogs

Investor Visa

Reply to “It must be the silly season”

“Infrequent” farang’s views on double pricing

Moaning killjoys

Alternative public transport suggestions

Why the Thai Tourism Industry needs to support cable TV

Editor;

It’s only TV...right? The very simple answer is - no.

Take a moment to think about it...close your eyes. Imagine you are overseas, in Thailand, on business or holiday. You want to know what’s going on in the world. You turn on the TV and what do you get? Thai language news programmes, Thai soap operas or shows and a few foreign language channels.

Satisfactory? Depends on your language skills and what foreign language programmes are available. But the idea of no English language news station to readers of this paper and educated Thais would be a real step back into the dark ages. And this is the real danger if UBC, the only national cable TV operator in Thailand, which is currently down sizing and restructuring to reduce crippling losses, goes out of business.

This would be a disaster for the Tourism industry. We constantly battle against international competition both world wide and close to home in Asia, pitching against the techno-savvy Singaporeans and venues like Hong Kong.

TV for a hotel or resort guest has become more than just a luxury item in the room. It’s a part of modern life and instant access to news and entertainment programmes is no longer optional -it’s as essential as a bed in the room.

The predicament that UBC is currently faced with should be of concern to all connected with the tourism industry. A Bt300 billion industry is in danger of losing an essential supplier. A service that in my mind is an integral part of a guest’s expectations, one they equate with quality accommodation and service.

And the dilemma - a monopolistic industry that can offer no real alternative to UBC.

A number of free-to-air channels and Thai TV - sure. But quality entertainment, sport, movies, news in English? No.

What of all the entertainment places, bars and pubs that regularly advertise special sporting events? Without cable access, many of these events cannot be shown live. In this industry if it’s not live coverage then forget it.

Then there’s the question of advertising. It’s often a personal choice that some like others don’t. For me, if it means sensible charges, limited to a reasonable number of minutes per hour and enables cable TV in Thailand to survive, then I’m for it. Better than the endless stream of gap fillers and ‘lift music’ we have to currently endure.

Lets face it, if we wanted a quick social snapshot of the times we live in, I suggest no better medium more clearly reflects the world today than advertising. It is the finger on the pulse of society, reflecting current lifestyles and trends.

Where advertising becomes intrusive is not necessarily the adverts themselves but the quantity in relation to the programming. I would suggest that this be restricted to be no more than 3-4 minutes at any one time, but this is again a personal view. Others would find even one minute of advertising too much.

As to the question why should we allow pay TV to earn revenue both from advertising and fees when public Thai TV does not? We only have to look at the quality of programming to understand that one of the players has substantially higher costs with imported programmes.

Does this mean that Thai TV is no good? Not necessarily; however, the programmes produced are often low budget studio based programmes, with a high degree of commercial sponsorship. In the context of satisfying the international visitor they fail. Thai TV, apart from the language barrier, has limited international appeal for these kinds of shows.

Finally the question of movies. Most good hotels have pay movies. So why have cable at all? The answer here is not every guest will want to pay and the time involved to watch a complete movie is limited. The most important reason of all, however, is the lack of news programmes.

Cable TV today is certainly just more than an option, it’s an essential service and I worry that if the present difficulties of UBC became insurmountable, then the country as a whole would suffer. Our tourism industry is a valuable foreign earner and UBC, or any cable operator, provide a valuable service that cannot be under estimated. The loss of this facility would have an impact on the quality of hospitality service we deliver. Therefore the tourism industry must stand firmly behind the cable operators to ensure they can continue to operate profitability and with longevity.

Andrew J Wood

General Manager

Royal Cliff Beach Resort

Back to Letters Headline Index

Barking dogs

Pattaya Mail,

Is there a place in town (similar to what we have in America, i.e., a Veterinary clinic) to call or go to? I myself along with a lot of my friends have problems with many stray dogs in the street. Staying up all night listening to the dogs bark is getting real old (the dog owners let them roam the streets and not take care of them). I have tried talking to the owners and they don’t seem to care if they bark all night or not. Hopefully Thailand will take care of this problem real soon. I’m at the end of my rope.

Bruce

Back to Letters Headline Index

Investor Visa

Dear Editor,

Your article regarding Investor Visas in the Column Section of the Pattaya Mail (dated June 22, 2001) is not entirely correct. In the case of cash deposits, you must be able to present a certificate of overseas transfer to a Thai owned bank. Having a bankbook in your name with at least 3 million baht on deposit is not enough. I found this out when I went to the Immigration in Bangkok and showed them one Thai bank account in which that I had at least 5 million on deposit.

Best regards,

Fred B. Field III

Back to Letters Headline Index

Reply to “It must be the silly season”

Sir,

I would like to point out to Mr. T. Crossley, who penned the “It must be the silly season” in issue 26, that “fed-up-with-moaners” letter (issue 22) at no time mentioned the Songkran festival. A bit puzzling that one...perhaps Mr. Crossley has got some letters and names confused?

“Fed-up-with-moaners” only pointed out that zoning would be a good idea for Pattaya (and I see that the local council are passing laws at the moment for that) rather than the suggested tactics of other readers who wanted bars to close early. Hopefully this will help residents combat noise pollution...too bad if you (that’s not intended as a stab at Mr. Crossley, just a general statement) decided to purchase that condo on Beach Road, Second Road, or in South Pattaya! FUWM also stated that if bars were to remain open until the owners decided it was time to close, this would help local business (a view often expressed by Bernard Trink, long time LOS resident and highly respected columnist of the Bangkok Post).

FUWM also stated that baht bus fares are not pricey compared to western countries, so why moan about it...that perhaps the moaners would be happier back in their own countries...why come to Thailand and try to make it just like the place they left behind (why leave to move to LOS if back home was so good and better?), since Pattaya is a tourist destination, and as such, tourists expect there to be a party atmosphere.

I think that a number of people share the view that, “If you don’t like it, why stay here”, (I certainly do) it’s not unique to FUWM. Pattaya is promoted in all the tourist brochures as a place to party, have fun and get away from it all. I am sure that the local businesses are happy to see such promotion too. But can we have it both ways and please both sides? Perhaps, but as Mr. Crossley pointed out, that will be difficult with the way things are done in LOS. All I can say is good luck, maybe if enough people complain and moan things will change (hopefully for the better). It gets a bit tedious reading about these issues week after week though...and here I am contributing to the topic!

I quite understand his points about noise pollution though. But it could be worse. He could be awakened at dawn every morning by somebody screaming phrases from the Koran through a loudspeaker! Personally, I prefer Pattaya, with all its shortcomings.

Also, I would like to point out that yes, foreigners do get charged more than the Thais...but I don’t earn (nor wish to earn) the salary of the average Thai, so I am not going to go ballistic about things like that.

Sanuk, Sanuk

Regards,

B. Scott

Back to Letters Headline Index

“Infrequent” farang’s views on double pricing

Editor;

In response to the so called “Frequent Farang” I can only surmise from his response to Mr. Jan Abbink and dual pricing that he is either a Frequent Thai or if he really is a farang he walks around Thailand with his eyes closed. Mr. Abbink’s letter was spot on and is aimed at making foreign tourists aware of the blatant rip-offs such as the 200 baht entrance fees to so-called National Parks. For one thing, many of these parks offer nothing more than maybe a small stream (waterfall?) or cave and are maybe worth a 20 baht entrance fee but certainly not 200 baht. How about Ko Samui, a National Park? How can a National Park be covered with bungalows and food carts? A 1000% increase to enter a National Park is outrageous (200 baht for foreigners versus 20 baht for locals) in this case or any other.

Believe it or not pal, tourists do stay away from these clip joints, if and when they are aware of this racist policy. Where does this writer get the idea that all tourists are rich as he seems to be or that there is a “dramatic difference in ability to pay”? What a crock. You’re “99% of all Thai’s couldn’t afford to get in” and “people (Thais) who make 1/20 of what a typical tourist earns” comments are way off the mark. If you are indeed frequent you obviously haven’t noticed the thousands of BMW’s, Mercedes Benzes, SUV’s etc. that clutter Thailand’s roads. Frequent Farang’s letter is indeed embarrassing to all foreigners looking for a fair shake. Let these rich bleeding hearts continue to pay the exaggerated prices to National Parks, Mini Siam, Crocodile Farm, Snake farm, Safari World, and plenty of others. I for one (and many like me) will continue to stay away until we are treated equally. There is plenty of other value in this country without these places. I for one welcome letters like the one from Mr. Abbink. Hopefully (but I doubt it) if enough negative feedback is generated the Thais running these so called businesses where tourists are ripped off will some day wise up.

Scott Benson

Pattaya

Back to Letters Headline Index

Moaning killjoys

Editor;

I just would like to send my thanks for a wonderful read. I look foreword to reading your paper every week. May I also say to all the killjoys that are moaning about the noise coming from the bars at night, this is Pattaya. The nighttime should be when it comes alive as in Spain and other tourist areas around the world. If you start to force early closing then tourists will go elsewhere, and that can only be bad news for the tourist industry and Thailand as a whole.

Phil Marlow,

Northampton, England

Back to Letters Headline Index

Alternative public transport suggestions

Editor;

Trams would be the best option plying from Naklua to Dolphin Roundabout, some via Beach Road to the police box then up and across South Pattaya Road, others from Dolphin along Second Road up and over the hill to Jomtien. Stop the coaches from using Beach Road or let them only go as far as Soi Regent Marina, the old coach stop. Get the (tour groups) to walk from there to A1 Royal Cruise or take the tram along Beach Road.

Thai construction to widen the Beach Road would be interesting as the subsoil has a high content of sand and within couple years it would slip onto beach.

Perhaps with baht buses the city hall could use a token system, i.e., we pay with tokens, and then the drivers would turn them in for cash. Tokens could be sold via hotels, etc,

Looking at this zone set up perhaps Pattaya needs some Nana Plaza type complexes.

Regards,

Sean Jehan

Back to Letters Headline Index

News | Business News  | Features | Columns | Letters | Sports | Auto Mania | Kid's Corner 
Who’s Who | Travel | Shopping | Our Community |  Classifieds
Community Happenings  | Books Music Movies | Sports Round-Up

Updated every Friday
Copyright 2001  Pattaya Mail Publishing Co.Ltd.
370/7-8 Pattaya Second Road, Pattaya City, Chonburi 20260, Thailand
Tel. 66-38 411 240-1, 413 240-1, Fax: 66-38 427 596

Updated by Chinnaporn Sungwanlek, assisted by Boonsiri Suansuk.
E-Mail: [email protected]

  Letters published in the Mailbag of Pattaya Mail  
are also on our website.

It is noticed that the letters herein in no way reflect the opinions of the editor or writers for Pattaya Mail, but are unsolicited letters from our readers, expressing their own opinions. No anonymous letters or those without genuine addresses are printed, and, whilst we do not object to the use of a nom de plume, preference will be given to those signed.