Muay Thai promoter calls for foreign judges after explosive scoring controversy

0
122
Muay Thai promoter Natthadej “Sia Boat” Wachirarattanawong has called for major reforms to judging at Rajadamnern Stadium, alleging controversial scoring and suggesting foreign judges and financial audits of officials to restore confidence in the sport.

BANGKOK, Thailand – Prominent Muay Thai promoter and Petchyindee Gym owner Natthadej “Sia Boat” Wachirarattanawong has launched a scathing attack on the judging at Rajadamnern Stadium, alleging that scorecards were effectively “locked in from the opening round” during the Petchyindee promotion on July 2. In an emotional interview posted on the Petchyindee Facebook page, Natthadej expressed outrage over several controversial decisions, particularly the bout between Kraduklek and Phetmuangkan, claiming the judging reflected deeper problems within Thai boxing. “I’ve been in Muay Thai my entire life,” he said. “Watching the atmosphere and the betting odds, I could tell the result was being decided from Round 1—not just in the championship rounds. It was obvious.”



Natthadej insisted his comments were not made lightly. “I don’t make accusations without reason. I watched every fight from the first bout to the last very carefully. I have credibility in this sport. If these words are coming from me, it means I’ve truly reached the end of my patience.” He also questioned the scoring in another contest involving Thianluang, saying the fighter should not have lost the fifth round. “Whether he won or lost the fight is one thing, but there is no way he should have lost Round 5, yet all three judges gave it against him.”

The promoter reserved his strongest criticism for the Kraduklek vs. Phetmuangkan fight, noting that Kraduklek fights under the Petchyindee banner. “Even though Kraduklek is my fighter, I’m speaking based on what I saw. He may have been behind after three rounds, but all three judges had him losing every round. It completely lacked any sense of fairness.” Calling for sweeping reforms, Natthadej said those responsible for overseeing judges should be completely independent of Rajadamnern Stadium to eliminate conflicts of interest. “The people supervising judges should be outsiders, not people from the stadium who protect one another. As long as judges investigate judges, nothing will ever change.” He proposed bringing in authorities with investigative powers, including the ability to examine judges’ financial records.


“In FIFA, referees’ financial transactions can be audited. Why can’t we do the same? The damage doesn’t just affect Rajadamnern Stadium—it damages Thailand’s national sport.” In one of his most striking remarks, Natthadej suggested hiring foreign judges if necessary. “Maybe we should bring in foreigners to judge the fights. I don’t think Thai judges can judge properly anymore.” His outspoken criticism has reignited debate over transparency, judging standards, and integrity in Muay Thai, with many fans now calling for reforms to restore confidence in the sport’s officiating.