|
Re: Chuan being
evasive
Editor;
Your 26 May-1 June 2000 photo caption indicated the
Prime Minister as being “evasive” in answering press questions. There
is more than one side to this issue.
I have had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Chuan in a
similar Meet the Press function earlier this year at Khon Kaen. We only
spoke a moment, but at least my questions got through and received
attention. This is not always the case here with government officials.
Chuan is in a very difficult position, surrounded by
scoundrels and opportunists who had a major hand in bringing Thailand to
its knees economically, but then made themselves into senators, cabinet
ministers, and other high-flying VIPs. His own upbringing is undoubtedly
influenced by his culture, and passing on the buck, in our eyes, might
just be the “Thai Way” of getting someone responsible to answer the
question. The Prime Minister is government leader, but barely. His
incumbency is made possible by a coalition of people many of whom more
often than not lack even basic intent to establish honest democracy here
in Thailand. It is very difficult to govern with a crowd like this. If the
Prime Minister is evasive, then those who slick talk and provide smooth
explanations about why things are not getting done are liars and
incompetents. Or, they are ignorant but know that to ask questions means
immediate loss of position and peer ostracism. Difficulty in governing,
and in thus being more open and more responsive, is compounded by the
national culture. There are very few people who would not take a part of
state coffers for their own pocket if they got a chance. Just ask anyone
around you. The local ethic is that “Of course I would.”
The Black May fiasco, with Saudi Arabian-type
censorship, deserves being brought to the attention of the United Nations
Commission on Human Rights. Just as does the summary execution of Burmese
students who took over a Thai hospital. You can’t have your cake and eat
it, too. Letting ethics get run over by greed and indignation in one case,
but demanding that they be applied in another, isn’t responsible
citizenship. It is that aspect of Thai democracy that is perhaps the real
culprit here, not of leadership being evasive. The really evasive nature
of Thai culture in failing to stand up to ethical issues and making the
right choice is. Chuan, if he is evasive, is so because he is Thai.
It brings one to consider the entire Thai reputation as
a nation that has a historically skilled foreign policy. After many
decades of being here, and of being reasonably fluent in the language, I
would question the skill value and instead accredit such historical
“successes” as to being more due to lack of commitment in carving out
a direction and then going toward it, rather than being a skilled
international diplomat. After all these centuries of skill, for example,
relations with Burma and Laos are far from where they should be. We
can’t blame Thailand for all of this, but it should shoulder part of the
responsibility. If its citizens could just shoulder responsibility
generally, Thailand’s Prime Ministers could govern a lot more
effectively, and be a lot less evasive.
Sincerely,
Frank G Anderson
Founder, the Korat Post
Yet more on the
American soldiers
Dear Pattaya Mail,
I really thought enough had been said on the above
subject, but I feel I really must reply to John P’s letter of last week.
1) The lady concerned did in fact report the rape to
the hotel’s manager, whose reply was stop crying, get out of my hotel
and don’t come back. When she did return with the police, the manager
said that a search warrant was required to enter the room. After a heated
conversation he agreed to phone the hotel room and ask the Americans to
come down to the lobby; however, he proceeded to phone the wrong room and
added further confusion to the event. Why did he do all this? Maybe
because at the time the hotel was 95% full of paying navy servicemen!
2) Regarding the attacker being stupid, maybe he was,
apart from the obvious things he didn’t do to avoid being captured, like
removing his name from the hotel room, filming the attack and letting the
tape be found was also stupid, maybe he thought he was above the law
anyway. Who would believe a working girl’s word against his? Reference
to John P’s letter shows us how true this is.
Whereas Mr. John P. is entitled to his views, I suggest
he refrains from sharing them with all of us. He does not know the full
details of the case, only a few of us do. The lady’s motive for bringing
this case to justice was never about money. When we left the Kitty Hawk
the American lawyer expressed his sorrow over the attack. The lady’s
reply: “Your sorrow will not mean anything to me until you have brought
these people to justice.” The reply given to her: “You have my word
that everything within my power will be used to track these people
down.”
When the case comes to court in Japan, I will advise
your readers of the outcome. Keep up the good work Pattaya Mail.
Tony
Smaller bottles,
same price
Editor;
I’ve now been a loyal Singha beer sipper for 36 years
and 4 months, and for almost the first time, I’m disappointed. Take a
look at the label on your next small bottle of Singha; it’s changed from
355 cc to 330 cc, with no reduction in price!
I don’t know for how many years Singha in the small
bottles has been 355 cc, in the old sort of long neck bottle, then in the
bottle with the sloped shoulder. It was always something to hold up
against the others; you get “more bang for your baht” with Singha,
until now. Look in your fridge for one of the old bottles, like just a
couple of weeks ago. It’s probably the 355 cc size. Then stack it up
against the 330 cc, same shape, not really noticeable until you compare
the size, or read the label.
So, I ask Boon Rawd Brewery, if you are going to reduce
the amount of suds in the bottles by some 7%, how about reducing the price
by 7%, too? A case of Singha in the “old” 355 cc bottles was about
baht 555 at the local wholesale shop, it’s still baht 555 in the
“new” 330 cc bottles.
Come on now, Boon Rawd, do something good for the
consumer, reduce the price by 7%.
Mac@Thanyaburi
US Rape Letters
Dear Editor;
My sympathy on this issue lies with Stephen Despopulos
and not John P.
I have seen the behaviour of many US sailors in many
ports and in general a small minority let the side down. Just because they
can afford a beer does not mean they can walk around as if they own the
place and treat all girls with contempt because the work in a ‘bar’.
As a member of the Royal Navy for over 25 years I have seen the way some
US service men treat girls in ports around the world. I witnessed similar
events quite recently in Pattaya. Many US service men spending only a
short time in the service have little experience of other cultures. They
seem to get little guidance on cross cultural etiquette from their
service. Some take advantage of circumstances.
I can say that if this incident had happened aboard an
RN ship when I was serving, the accused would have been safer in a Thai
prison than back on board.
I can imagine what has happened just as well as John P.
But my experience of Thai people in general and some US service men in
particular, leads me to believe that Stephen D has a much more realistic
interpretation of the events.
My own opinion,
Peter Ash
York, UK
Amazing Mr. Knapp
Sir,
The letter from Mr. Martin Knapp (2/6) is amazing.
After a free medical consultation costing about 3,000 baht, he whinges
over 350 baht for his medication. Then he deprives his government of 85
baht by disposing of his prescription. If his wallet is ‘strained’ by
such a huge sum, how does he afford to fly from one kingdom to the other
at a cost of more than 20,000 baht?
Puzzled!
Dr. M.J. Nightingale
UBC & Euro 2000
Dear editor,
I subscribed to UBC half a year ago so I could watch
the Euro 2000 soccer final when I’m on vacation here. I made inquiries
to UBC and they said it wouldn’t be a problem to watch it on one of the
UBC sport channels while the Euro 2000 was taking place.
However, now UBC doesn’t show the football but I have
to watch Channel 3 in Thai and the constantly irritating commercials.
That’s not why I bought UBC and I think it’s not acceptable that UBC
doesn’t show it.
I phoned UBC and they said they were very sorry, I
could view channel 3 through UBC.
Now I want to cancel my membership because I feel in 2
years I will not be able to watch the world championship also and what
more will come.
I paid 6000 Bht for renting the satellite equipment and
I told them they had to return that to me. UBC said they would return only
1000 Bht and that is what I will not accept also. So I will not return the
satellite-equipment until I get my 6000 Bht. They can sue me if they like.
Better to watch the local cable company for 350 Bht,
instead of UBC’s 1216 Bht, which will undoubtedly have the Euro 2000.
Best regards,
Herman Puts
Thanking the Royal
Garden
Dear Sir,
I am an employee of multi-national firm from Penang
which has a new sister company recently setup in Amata City, Rayong.
On behalf of the Moslem Penang support staff assisting
our Thai counterparts in Amata, we would like to extend our most sincere
appreciation to the management and staff of the Royal Garden Resorts,
Pattaya, for their initiative in providing us a Moslem corner at breakfast
each morning. We believe RGR may be the one and only hotel in Pattaya who
has best served the needs of their Moslem clientele.
Kudos to all staff of RGR! In particular, we would like
to thank Mr. Robertson and Kun Suchit for their understanding of our
special dietary needs and the outstanding efforts they have taken to make
our periodic stays pleasant and wonderful. We hope our association with
RGR will be a long one.
Thank you.
Yours truly,
Ali
Copyright 2000 Pattaya Mail Publishing Co.Ltd.
370/7-8 Pattaya Second Road, Pattaya City, Chonburi 20260, Thailand
Tel.66-38 411 240-1, 413 240-1, Fax:66-38 427 596; e-mail: [email protected]
Updated by Chinnaporn Sangwanlek, assisted
by Boonsiri Suansuk.
|
Letters published
in the Mailbag of Pattaya Mail
are also on our website. |
It is
noticed that the letters herein in no way reflect the opinions of the editor or writers
for Pattaya Mail, but are unsolicited letters from our readers, expressing their
own opinions. No anonymous letters or those without genuine addresses are printed, and,
whilst we do not object to the use of a nom de plume, preference will be given to those
signed. |
|