|
- HEADLINES [click on headline to view story]:
-
I say why not?
-
Who runs the country?
-
Mystified
-
Caught speeding
-
No color food
-
Uncaring, unthinking Thais and farangs are trashing Pattaya
-
Bad boat experience
-
Nanny government
|
I say why not?
Editor;
In the 7 May mailbag Re: government regulation by John
Arnone, he states that because he is a smoker the government unfairly
imposes higher insurance premiums on him. I say why not? Because smokers
have many more health problems because of their degraded health from self
poisoning. Smokers require more medical services than non smokers. It’s also
a fact that smokers take more sick days off than non smokers to the point
that some companies do not hire smokers at all.
Then he asks what is the problem if he smokes in a park.
I’ll tell you; nonsmokers in the park have to breathe the polluted smoky
air.
Lawrence Remington,
Bangkok
Who runs the country?
Editor;
It certainly is not the government, after the debacles of
the yellow shirts (a couple of years ago) and now the red shirts. In both
cases neither the army nor police would obey legitimate orders given by the
prime minister.
Nearer to home, about fourteen years ago the highest
court in this land decreed that the 101 businesses on the beach side of
Walking Street were built illegally and as such have to be pulled down. To
date not one has come down, (in fact they are still building and renovating
the place). Could it be that the same people who have no respect for the
government or its laws are in charge in Pattaya? My company has recently
purchased a building on the legal side of Walking St. and I would like to
know why I don’t have the view of Pattaya Bay that I am entitled to by law.
Anyone who would like to clarify the situation for me can contact me on
email [email protected]
J.C.
Mystified
Editor;
On 22nd April 2010 I received a congratulatory card
posted in Andover Hampshire on 2nd April.
According to the postmark it was received at the
Southampton Royal Mail Exchange at 6.13pm the same day.
A postmark clearly shows that it was received at
Banglamung on 7th April.
I find it difficult to understand why a letter, correctly
addressed in both English and Thai, took only 6 days to travel from the U.K.
to Thailand, but 14 days to travel from Banglamung to South Pattaya.
I am aware it was during the Songkran period, but
checking back previous letters find that this is par for the course.
Yours faithfully,
Brian P Wale
Caught speeding
Editor;
I am an Italian man living in Pattaya and from January to
now, every week I go to Bangkok with some of my friends. I go by my car
driving myself on motorway n. 3 (Chonburi-Bangkok). Usually I come back in
the afternoon from Bangkok to Pattaya by motorway n. 3 and usually some
police by motorcycle is standing at the pay toll and every time they stop me
and tell me I made an infraction, normally for exceeding the speed limit.
I made an experiment and I did not exceed the 60 Km/hour
and the same they stopped me and asked me to pay the fine. I do not have any
tool for demonstrate I did not exceed the speed limit, so I have every time
to pay the fine.
The fine is not always the same. For 8 times I had to pay
and they never gave me any recipe. Sometimes they asked for 300 baht,
sometimes 500 baht, one time they asked me for 1,500 baht! And every time I
have to trash a lot of time for listen and understand what the policemen
need from me. The last time I prepared 200 baht and showed it to the
policemen. The policemen took the money and gave me back my driving license
and I had not to trash a lot of time.
I noted that more cars are stopped by the police and
every time they are falang.
So now I have to do a long way for come back by motorway
n. 7 because the way is longer, but it is a lot less expensive and I take
the same time because I don’t have to stop to pay a fine.
(sic)
Best regards,
(Name withheld by request)
No color food
Editor;
When it comes to food and ice cream, there’s no color
discrimination as proven by these lovely nurses during their lunch break at
Phyathai Hospital Sriracha who were enjoying their multi- colored ice
sorbet.
Sue K
Uncaring, unthinking Thais and farangs are trashing Pattaya
(Ed’s note, we only have room for one photo; the photo at
Jomtien Beach)
Aloha;
There are 6 pictures here; the first one is the storm
drain at the rear entrance of Tuk Com Pattaya, full of toxic garbage waiting
for the next rain to wash it into the ocean. The second is the storm drain
on Thappraya Rd and Jomtien Beach Rd next to Seven Eleven, full of rancid
grease 30 meters from the ocean we play in and fish live. The third and
fourth picture is garbage on the beach that has been there for many months,
a real bad thing for beach-goers to see or children to play in. It is
located on Jomtien Beach Rd and Thappraya Rd 30 meters from the Dongtan
Beach Police Box.
People need to understand and realize that what they put
into the storm drains ends up in restaurants and on our table at home; we
need to stencil the storm drains in Thai and English with pictures that all
understand. This should be done in heavy foot traffic areas.
We also should fine the people that put trash into the
drains.
Signed,
The Pollution Solution Group
Bad boat experience
Editor;
I’m a 40-something happily married American national,
living in Thailand with my family.
My wife isn’t too fond of the sun, but I love the beach,
so I go to Koh Larn by myself sometimes. On the 1700 ferry ride back to
Pattaya recently, a 60-ish year old, very drunk Russian lady offers me some
fresh pineapple. I politely decline. She speaks zero Thai and zero English,
so it’s all sign language as I speak zero Russian. Fair enough.
Three minutes later she squirms her way into a space
where there was no room to begin with on a very crowded boat, lays her head
on my shoulder and starts trying to put her hand down my pants. That is just
un-civilized. Yeah, she was an old fat drunk woman, but even if she were a
young super-model, civilized people don’t do things like this.
I just removed myself from her clutches (that she was
going for in front of 100 people). She took the hint, stayed in my previous
seat, then proceeded to pass out.
I should have called the police at Bali Hai and pressed
charges. Talk about un-couth!
If I had tried that with a Thai or Russian girl 20 years
my junior I’d be arrested and deported immediately. I’d have arrived at the
jail with black eyes and broken ribs also.
In all seriousness, she tried to sexually molest me, in
public. It was quite sickening.
Ken
Nanny government
Sir,
John Arnone presents a plausible argument decrying
unnecessary government legislation, but destroys it by his almost
pathological need to defend unrestricted smoking. Since the introduction of
smoking legislation in 2007 in the UK there has already been a 20% reduction
in heart attacks. Surely Mr. Arnone cannot wish innocent people to have
heart attacks?
Doubtless it was with tongue in cheek that he asked what
harm there was in a smoker sitting on a park bench smoking. Isn’t that what
most tax evaders, child molesters, fare dodgers and shop lifters say to
justify their particular nefarious activities? The answer is almost too
obvious to relate, but in the first place he or she will be poisoning the
air for a distance of several hundred metres, depending upon the wind
conditions. This is, at the least, extremely uncivil as well as being
unpleasant to those who enter the park to breathe fresh air. The main fault
in his proposition, however, is that no smoker only sits on a park bench to
smoke; they smoke in lifts, around swimming pools, on beaches, in
restaurants, in buses and even in the sea itself. Mr. Arnone seems to be
unable to understand that smoking legislation is needed to protect ordinary
people from what is, in effect, common assault.
One would not expect to find people copulating on a park
bench, even though this would be doing no harm to anyone. Why, then, should
we have to put up with people smoking which is both unpleasant and harmful?
Is this too difficult for smokers to comprehend?
Dr. M.
|
|
|
|
Letters published in the Mailbag of Pattaya Mail
are also published here.
|
It is noticed that the letters herein in no way reflect the opinions of the editor or writers for Pattaya Mail, but are unsolicited letters from our readers, expressing their own opinions. No anonymous letters or those without genuine addresses are printed, and, whilst we do not object to the use of a nom de plume, preference will be
given to those signed.
|
|