- HEADLINES [click on headline to view story]:
-
Support Father Ray Brennan
-
Disgusting slurs
-
Support from Canada
for Father Ray
-
True or exciting stories
|
|
Support Father Ray Brennan
Dear Editor,
...and dear friends, Thai and international, an English
newspaper called “The People” which is a member of the “gutter tabloid
press” has seen fit to increase its flagging circulation with an attack on
OUR Father Ray Brennan.
Reading their lies, half truths and sneering innuendo you
will see how they are eager to cloak themselves in the typical cowards’
garb of evasive and deniable ‘shadow speech’.
The ‘People’s’ paparazzi whom they elevate to the
title of investigative journalists claim to have posed as paedophiles to
trap Father Ray. Neither was he trapped nor did they fool him for a
nanosecond. He saw they were probably not posing at all. Let them return to
face us in Pattaya - let them face Father Ray - before they are marched off
to a long spell in jail to reform their evil ways.
I am not a Roman Catholic - yet I know Father Ray is of
far greater worth than his organisation. Below the King, no other man,
neither Thai nor farang has ever contributed more to the well being of its
subjects in Pattaya.
Here is a man who has worked around the ‘pillars of
corruption’ to protect the innocent, the weak and the unwanted.
Let all decent men and women join in defending
Pattaya’s Father Ray Brennan in any way you think you can. Let us all show
Father Brennan and those who would rob him and us of his wonderful
reputation that we treat their lies with contempt.
God Bless you Father Ray - and damnation to your enemies.
Chris Hill
Disgusting slurs
Editor;
I am disgusted to read the slurs on the good name of Fr.
Ray Brennan and the Pattaya Orphanage. This man has devoted his life to
those less fortunate than many of us. For a London Tabloid to do this is
despicable behaviour. Of course the reporter was not identified as the story
is untrue! People throughout the world know of the excellent work and
reputation of Father Ray Brennan and the Pattaya Orphanage. We will continue
to pray for you and your charges and continue to support you financially.
John X. Berlin
Sydney, Australia
Support from Canada
for Father Ray
Dear Sir,
I have read the article in your newspaper titled:
“Father Brennan denies British tabloid report”. Also I have read the
Tabloid article which is mentioned.
I am saddened to read the article ... not just because of
what it says about Father Ray (I have the greatest faith in him and respect
for the man he has shown himself to be ... and this Tabloid article
certainly does not change that). I am saddened most of all, because people
are so quick to judge others and ignore their own faults ... and that (in
this situation) will be detrimental to the orphanage, which does such
exceptional work!
My understanding of Buddhist teachings, which are similar
to my Christian beliefs, is that we should try not to pass judgment on
others. We have too many sins of our own, that demand our attention, without
adding the sin of judging others! My sentiment is to let God do His work of
judging and let humans get on with looking after their own sins.
I did some investigation after reading these articles.
First, in reading the article, I noticed that the author
was not identified. The norm for any reputable newspaper or magazine is to
identify the author. The Pattaya Mail certainly identifies the
authors of its articles.
Secondly, the comments that are given as quotes from the
discussion were not in a logical sequence, as normal conversation usually
occurs. Obviously the statements are taken out of context! It is very poor
journalism ... these writers would be better at writing gossip columns
instead of trying to pass themselves off as newspaper writers.
Third, checking on the tabloid, I found that it is a
tabloid with a falling circulation. This tabloid is desperate to get
circulation at any cost. It has in the past, as it seems to be doing now,
fabricated stories without concern for those whom they hurt.
Usually tabloids are characterized by their outlandish,
sensationalist headlines, at the slightest whim of news. Real news is not a
prerequisite for a tabloid. This seems to best describe this particular
tabloid.
It is really sad that statements in the tabloid article
should be said so casually. The tabloid is attempting to carry out trials
and condemnations within its’ reporting! That is pathetic.
I hope that everyone who reads or hears tabloid
information will also have the good sense and human compassion to question
such exceptionally poor journalism.
What really bothers me, especially in cases like this, is
that the victim is not only Father Ray ... it also affects the needy Thai
children and adults who depend upon donations to be able to achieve a
reasonable human lifestyle; which the orphanage provides. That is really the
great sadness of such unfounded accusations.
In my case, I have been a financial supporter of the
orphanage in the past and will continue in the future.
My fervent wish and prayer is that the many orphaned
children, the deaf and blind children, the seniors, and the street children
that have benefited from the orphanage will not be harmed by the reckless
writing of this tabloid.
Father Ray, as I have come to know him, may be a senior
citizen based on his age, but in personal strength he is a youth. He has
tremendous love for the people that continue to benefit from the orphanage.
I am confident that he will not allow any personal harm to himself, to
reduce his on-going efforts to work and speak out, on behalf of these people
that he loves.
The needy children at the orphanage require Father
Ray’s support, as well as ours.
Respectfully yours,
Daniel E. Campbell, Canada
True or exciting stories
Dear Sir,
If we read an article or to listen to a person telling a
story, we should ask ourselves what kind of stories we really want to listen
to or be exposed to, true stories or “exciting” stories? To this
question many would answer that they would prefer true stories, which are
exciting. But in reality not so many true stories are exciting.
Frequently we see the headlines that look interesting and
we immediately buy the paper looking for exciting stories. But when we read
the contents we find that nothing is as exciting as it was headlined. This
is because the stories are (usually) true and are not as exciting as the
headline which was designed to make you buy the paper. In fact, whilst the
news should be an accurate report of a true story, many times it is twisted,
or “spun” as they say now, to make it exciting.
In England, it must be admitted, the freedom of the press
is a very real fact. This can make an insignificant into a scandalous story
even if it is vastly exaggerated. As a result the royal family and other
celebrities in England always have a bad time with the press watching and
reporting their every move. Unscrupulous paparazzi went further and stole a
hair from a member of the royal family to test it for DNA without
considering what damages and difficulties it would create for the family. We
also have to ask ourselves, what was the root cause of Princess Diana’s
death? Was it not because she was trying to escape from reporters and
photographers looking for an exciting story? Please think about how much
damage is caused by reporters and editors “spinning” ordinary news into
exciting or apparently scandalous stories. This practice is not only cruel
to the victims but can also affect their jobs and the institutions that they
created to do good. Is there any justification for that?
Just this happened in Pattaya last week. Admittedly
Pattaya has been branded a ‘sinful city’ in spite of the fact that there
is less real sin here than in most of the capitals of the world, West and
East. It was once a family resort where the beautiful environment and
tranquil atmosphere could (and still can) be enjoyed. Later it became more
of a nightlife resort visited mostly by people looking for fun, fun, fun at
night. Then problems followed, the city became full of street kids, drug
addicts, babies born out of wedlock and others deserted by the mothers.
Therefore intervention by “respectable institutions”, which are opposite
to evil, came to be required.
The charitable institutes and respectable organizations
did not happen over-night. It took over 30 years to reach their present size
and become a very essential part of the health of the community. Many
children whose lives would have been misery and would have probably grown up
to be criminal addicts or prostitutes have become good and useful citizens
of the kingdom as a result of the efforts of such organizations. Many
handicapped youths who would have had to beg for a living are now running
their own successful enterprises and employing others. If these institutes
of grace had been evil, how could this happen and why have they been
operating for so long? If the founder of such an institute were only
interested in young boys, why did he accept girls as well? Why then bother
to establish other institutions, such as a school for the blind, an old age
home and a school for the disabled?
Now an unscrupulous and malevolent person with what can
only be called evil intent to create a scandal and line his pocket by
arranging a situation from which a story could be fabricated bringing
disrepute upon an institution which has done immeasurable good for many
years has exposed his vicious sting. Purely for the titillation of those
eager to hear bad of anyone and anywhere, particularly Pattaya, he pretended
that he wanted to make a big donation and interviewed the founder of the
charitable institution, asking whether he could take the boys out on a trip
even though he was a pedophile. Children from the institution are frequently
taken out during the day. I have often seen men take scores of the boys on
boat trips and can see that both the men and the children are happy. I am
sure that nothing untoward happens to upset the boys or they would report it
to their mentors at the home. The boys are returned at the end of a pleasant
day, which otherwise they would not have been able to enjoy. Is every good
man who has over the years donated money to the institute a pedophile? Why
didn’t the interviewer ask a straightforward question such as, “I have
money, I like to have sex with boys and I will make donation if I can take a
boy to have sex with me?” Then, if the answer had been exciting, by all
means let us all share in such exciting and scandalous news.
Only one person does not look after the hundreds of boys
living under the care of the orphanage. If someone were to walk into the
place he would be asked the question, “Do you have any business here?”
Even if you visit the founder of the place, an explanation still has to be
given for your interest. There are tens of caregivers looking after the
children. This is a place where high-ranking government authorities,
ambassadors and members of our own royal family and those of other countries
have regularly visited and commended them on the good work they are doing.
How then can this place be called a brothel? Please be fair, Mr Unscrupulous
Journalist, for the sake of hundreds of deserted, disabled and blind
children and the street kids who, in this city at least, have a welcoming
home to go to. We pray that you may be able to live with yourself after the
evil thing that you have done simply to line your pocket and create an
“exciting” story for the titillation of the masses.
Premprecha Dibbayawan
Attorney at Law
MCL Miami University
|
|
|
|
News | Business News | Features | Columns | Letters | Sports | Auto Mania
Kid's Corner | Who’s Who | Travel | Our Community | Dining Out & Entertainment
Social Scene | Classifieds | Community Happenings | Books Music Movies
Club in Pattaya | Sports Round-Up
E-mail: [email protected]
Pattaya Mail Publishing Co., Ltd.
370/7-8 Pattaya Second Road, Pattaya City, Chonburi 20260, Thailand
Tel.66-38 411 240-1, 413 240-1, Fax:66-38 427 596
Copyright © 2002 Pattaya Mail. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
|
|
|
Letters published in the Mailbag of Pattaya Mail are also on our website.
|
| It is noticed that the letters herein in no way reflect the opinions of the editor or writers for Pattaya Mail, but are unsolicited letters from our readers, expressing their own opinions. No anonymous letters or those without genuine addresses are printed, and, whilst we do not object to the use of a nom de plume, preference will be
given to those signed.
|
|