|
Is it perhaps?
Editor:
For many who take the trip to visit "Amazing Thailand" for
its culture and beaches, its inevitable that after their "clean air" experience
in Bangkok, a trip to at least one island is added to their itinerary.
What is it, though, that attracts people to visit such islands as Koh
Samui and Koh Samet rather than some of the local beaches? Is it perhaps that these
islands provide cleaner water to swim in? Is it perhaps that you can walk on sand barefoot
without any fear of cutting yourself? Is it perhaps that in some of these parts you can
actually find rest and recovery without being haggled every two minutes by a hawker
offering you a shirt, ice-cream, body-massage, etc. Is it perhaps that when you swim in
the water, you dont have to worry about any speed boats or jet skis running
over the top of your head?
And why is it that many of these luxurious hotels prefer their guests
to swim in their pools situated right near the beach instead of encouraging people to
actually swim in the nearby seas? Is it perhaps that these hotels will have to foot the
medical bill of its guests due to its own contamination of the local water via the their
sewerage outlet?
Whilst the construction of a proper sewerage system has been long
overdue, there are still many other issues apart from those listed above, which need to be
addressed before tourists and locals alike start heading back to the beach for actual rest
and play. As some tourists in Phuket are now discovering, the value for money in Pattaya
is far greater than in Phuket; the other side of the coin, though, is that Phuket has far
cleaner beaches.
Will there ever be actual proper maintenance and management of the
surrounding bays? Will local hotels do the same next year as their Phuket counterparts
have done this year in doubling their rates when this years Phuket tourists turn to
Pattaya next year? Lets hope that local officials will get their heads out of the sand for
this year and make a concerned effort in cleaning up Pattayas beaches and tourism.
Justin Brierty
The mayor of Pattaya and the 101
Dear Sir,
Congratulations to Mayor Pairat Suthithamrongsawat for his wise and
timely stand against the government interference in what most people would see as a matter
for Pattaya City and its people, the attempt to destroy the new and major attraction in
the city, the "Walking Street". This was almost destroyed a little earlier when
the whole length of it became impassable on foot or in any vehicle, during the laying of
water pipes for the water purification scheme. We do not want this money-spinning area
once more laid to waste: enough people came and looked quickly at the recent chaos, and
enough more were advised by foreign travel agents to give Pattaya a miss while all this
was going on.
There are enough good and cogent reasons to allow the 101 shops to
continue to trade; their revenue for the city and the Kingdom surely will far outweigh any
seeming advantage to result from the landfill and "permanent" pier. The present
pier, once dubbed as also "illegal" by, if I am right, the Harbours Department,
seems to have been quietly forgotten. The Department named must surely come under some
government minister (Communication and Transport?), and as we were told that the pier had
"government approval", surely the Department ought to have made its case (if it
had one) much earlier than it did - which was when it was complete and a grand opening was
planned. On this showing the government would be likely to approve the retention of the
"101" when they were sure the last one had been pulled down!
I have only one complaint about the "Walking Street": this is
that the gates are re-opened to wheeled traffic at midnight, when the shops, bars, and
entertainment places are all still in full swing and the street is thronged with walkers,
all enjoying this rare treat. Suddenly, and with no warning, they find that they have to
jump for their lives when all kinds of vehicles bear down upon them. I dont know
that there has been an accident yet, but if not it is one still waiting to happen.
3:00 a.m. or even later would be of no inconvenience to drivers, etc.,
and by that time most of the establishments would be closed and walkers far fewer. Think
about it, City Hall!
Yours faithfully,
John D. Blyth
More fake Viagra
Dear Sir,
I read Neil Youngs letter in last weeks Mail and I am
embarrassed to admit that I suffered the same misfortune recently. As I am getting on in
years my girlfriend treated me to what I thought would be an ideal pick-me-up.
The after effects were so distressing that I spent 10 uncomfortable days in hospital. My
girlfriend purchased the tablet in South Pattaya from what we thought to be a reputable
chemist. I hope the authorities can stamp down on these fakes before there is a fatality
from the after effects.
Yours,
Davey Dodsworth,
Co. Durham, UK.
Copyright 1998 Pattaya Mail Publishing Co.Ltd.
370/7-8 Pattaya Second Road, Pattaya City, Chonburi 20260, Thailand
Tel.66-38 411 240-1, 413 240-1, Fax:66-38 427 596; e-mail: [email protected]
Created by Andy Gombaz, assisted by Chinnaporn Sangwanlek. |
Letters published
in the Mailbag of Pattaya Mail will also be on our website. |
It is
noticed that the letters herein in no way reflect the opinions of the editor or writers
for Pattaya Mail, but are unsolicited letters from our readers, expressing their
own opinions. No anonymous letters or those without genuine addresses are printed, and,
whilst we do not object to the use of a nom de plume, preference will be given to those
signed. |
|