|
- HEADLINES [click on headline to view story]:
-
Just plain inconsiderate
-
Who would take any notice?
-
Long time Jomtien resident
-
Loving kindness
-
Violence on the street
|
Just plain inconsiderate
Editor;
Regarding the 14 May ‘Nanny Government’ excellent letter
By Dr. M in response to the 7 May diatribe by John Arnone: In the last
paragraph Dr. M questions why smokers cannot comprehend that secondhand
smoke is a problem for nonsmokers. I would like to answer that question
based on the many negative and hostile confrontations I have had with
smokers.
Some are actually just uneducated and oblivious. Some
deny and rationalize that second hand smoke is not harmful, and if outside,
the wind will blow it away. Most are just plain inconsiderate and do not
care.
And finally, anyone who smokes in the first place would
not be expected to comprehend the problem.
Lawrence Remington
Bangkok
Who would take any notice?
Sir,
It was very good to read that HRH Princess Chulabhorn has
reminded Thai physicians about the dangers of air pollution; particularly
the much less appreciated carcinogenic effect of smoke from joss sticks.
The point that needs to be made, and made forcibly, is
that all smoke is carcinogenic and dangerous whether it be from cigarettes,
joss sticks, incense, cooking or bonfires. Many perfumes, too, are
dangerous; so only those made entirely from natural ingredients should be
used.
It seems strange that we are bombarded with information
about the dangers of sunlight, much of it misplaced, yet we scarcely ever
hear or read about the dangers of smoke apart from tobacco. The common
practice of igniting bonfires, often containing tyres and plastic material
is particularly obnoxious and should be made illegal. But if that were done,
who would take any notice?
Dr. M.
Long time Jomtien resident
Editor;
I know I am only a farang living happily in Thailand and
as such have no right to voice any opinion. An Afghan living in the UK has
more rights there than I do here, despite bringing in millions of baht into
Thailand over the years.
I think and hope I am not stupid but when I read about
low levels of water in Mabprachan reservoir again. I am confused why after
so many years of water shortages in Thailand in general, and Pattaya in
particular, nothing ever changes. I believe there is an authority to oversee
the conservation of water; if there is they seem to be useless, no surprise
there!
Pattaya City Hall keeps granting building permission for
condo after condo and housing projects without any regard for the
infrastructure to support these developments, roads, drainage, water
electricity, telephone and internet connections. The least said about the
latter the better. Cambodia is light years ahead in that field whilst
Thailand wallows in vacillating. It would seem the beloved of the red shirts
tied up the communications system in knots to further his own interests,
whilst he was running his own personal fiefdom here in Thailand, and untying
the knots is beyond the present authorities capabilities without the help of
Big Daddy.
Mabprachan water level is reported to be at a dangerously
low level again and Pattaya residents are suffering from lack of water.
There are water delivery trucks everywhere. Are they all owned by City Hall
officials I wonder?
RW
Loving kindness
Editor;
I’ve been watching the news as many of us have the last
few weeks because of all the turmoil in Bangkok. What I’m about to tell all
you good Thai people may shock you, but it’s just an opinion from an
American. I don’t vote here and I really have nothing to do with politics,
even though I still vote in US elections.
I’m going to paint a very dark picture for you, so get
ready. In the USA if you want to protest or even have a parade for some good
cause, first you must go to the local city hall (ampur office) and seek
permission from the city leaders and get a written permit. Then and only
then you and your team are allowed to have your show for the public in the
locations and times stated in the permit.
Now listen carefully, if you fail to do this and continue
some type of action without the permit the police will arrive. First they
will ask if you have a permit. If you answer ‘no’, they will ask you to
leave. Now here it comes; if you refuse to leave, they will remove you on
the very first day you took this action on you own.
Your removal and your health depends upon the very next
decision you make. If it’s unruly you will be handcuffed and taken to jail.
If you fight and or resist the police they will meet violence with violence.
Now you may go to the hospital, but it’ll also be in handcuffs. If you
continue your harsh actions and attempt to hurt and or injure any policeman
you may be shot.
There’s not much else I can say, but what ever happened
to the Thai way of ‘loving kindness?’ You must win your elections the right
way and that’s by getting more good folks on your side and beat the other
team with a sound election victory.
I pray for all of you,
Jesse Salazar
Violence on the street
Shana Kongmun
I won’t go into the politics of this entire thing
because, while I do have an opinion, in light of all that’s happened, here
(in Chiang Mai) and in Bangkok, it’s not appropriate to air. I think. I
will, however, share my experiences of late.

Bullet holes next to the front door of the hotel in
Bangkok, more than a little too close for anyone’s comfort.
My friend convinced me to fly down to Bangkok the weekend
of the 15th for a girls night out. Sure, there were threats of an imminent
crackdown but those have been ongoing for weeks. It seemed silly to put my
life on hold for something that may or may not happen. Unfortunately for me
and my friends, not only was that the weekend it did happen but we also
chose to stay in a hotel that had been, prior to this, in a safe zone; Soi
Ngam Duphli, just off Rama IV. The Kasikorn Bank that was torched was less
than 20 meters away. The day I arrived, things seemed to be changing, but
how were we to know that within an hour of my arrival bullets would start
flying? Hindsight is a marvelous thing, and I would have told myself, “Get
out now” had I realized.
I had gone to a friend’s place just down the soi, only to
find myself trapped inside the apartment, watching soldiers advance down the
road, Molotov cocktails being thrown, tires being burned. There were loud
cheers from the red shirt side of the street and while not terrified at the
time, it hit me later how really frightening it was, delayed shock my
friends said.
When the shooting died down a few hours later, I ventured
out in to the soi, to go back down, collect my trapped friend and get the
heck out of Dodge. On my way, several men leaning against their motorcycles
eyed me and said, “Hello, where you go?” I am used to the friendly, shouted
version of this oft used phrase in Thailand. This was not that version.
Perhaps they wondered what crazed farang woman would be walking down the soi
and to the hotel, but it unsettled me as it felt to me as an implied threat
of some kind. Perhaps it was the tear gas and flying bullets that made me
suspicious but I was much relieved to enter the hotel, albeit via the back
way since they had had to block off the now bullet riddled entrance. Red
shirts had attempted to enter the hotel so staff had blocked off the main
doors and someone had parked his truck across the car park entrance so they
couldn’t enter.

Smoke
rises from the burning tires on Rama IV.
Two days later the bank on the corner was torched.
As dusk approached and we frantically tried to figure out
a way of getting out, the option of walking out was offered and rejected, I
knew there was no way two single women were walking past those guys again,
taxis couldn’t get in, and we couldn’t get out. So, we stayed the night.
Waking up to the intermittent sounds of what could only have been some kind
of bomb, and sporadic gunfire, the whole thing was surreal.
We got out the next morning with two gentlemen who shared
their ride with us; they were headed to the airport, we to the higher
numbers of Sukhumvit to find our other friend, who had been, thankfully,
unable to return to the hotel after a day of shopping.
With a friend who was still trapped in his apartment on
the very same soi we had just escaped, I fretted until I learned that he had
finally managed to get out yesterday afternoon. Another friend was forced to
remain in his apartment off Sukhumvit, hopefully both of their neighborhoods
return to safety. Another Bangkok friend had had enough and left yesterday
for the beach, only to find out that the Tesco Lotus that he shops at in On
Nut had been attacked as the violence had branched out across the city.
Central World is destroyed, at the latest count, more
than 39 buildings were torched, and the Channel 3 building was set alight
with staff trapped inside, rescued by helicopters, thankfully. It seems the
troubles have come to Chiang Mai as well, albeit so far, on a much smaller
scale, with red shirts burning tires on Nawarat Bridge. A woman I know was
stuck in traffic on Sunday when the motorcycles came through, with people
pounding on car roofs and hoods. There are reports of attempts to enter the
Imperial Mae Ping Hotel, before being chased off, banks being attacked and
random fires during the night.
Curfew has been instituted in the province and an economy
already suffering from a lack of tourists will shortly see itself buckle
under if this continues much longer, for who wants to come to a city where
you aren’t sure if violence can erupt at any time? And now, as many
protestors return from Bangkok, what do we residents of Chiang Mai have to
look forward to? Can peace be kept? Can some kind of reconciliation come
about? Or will we see this city’s reputation as equally tarnished in the
eyes of the travelling community as Bangkok’s is now?
|
|
|
|
Letters published in the Mailbag of Pattaya Mail
are also published here.
|
It is noticed that the letters herein in no way reflect the opinions of the editor or writers for Pattaya Mail, but are unsolicited letters from our readers, expressing their own opinions. No anonymous letters or those without genuine addresses are printed, and, whilst we do not object to the use of a nom de plume, preference will be
given to those signed.
|
|