BUSINESS 
HEADLINES [click on headline to view story]: 

Fixed period employment contracts for a wise employer

Trade wants government’s security assurance


Fixed period employment contracts for a wise employer

David Tan
Employers have been using fixed period employment contracts on employees to avoid having to pay severance and provide prior notice of employment termination to employees (when the employer terminates the employment contract not due to employee’s serious misconduct).  With the commencing date and ending date of the employment contract clearly specified in the written contract, the employee’s employment will just cease on the ending date of the employment contract.  There is no need for the employer to pay severance and provide prior notice of employment termination.
In fact Paragraph 3 of Section 118 of the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998) provides: “Payment of severance pay is not applicable to employees who have a fixed term of employment and whose employment is terminated in accordance at the end of the specified term.”
This means that for employees with employment contracts that specify clearly the starting date and ending date of employment, the employment contract will lapse at the ending date of employment.  Given that the employment contract had ended and not terminated, there is no need for the employer to pay severance and provide prior notice of employment termination to the employee.
However, to be wise, the employer needs to be aware that Section 118 itself and Supreme Court decisions have narrowed down the meaning of a fixed period employment contract.
According to Paragraph 4 of Section 118, the following kinds of employment are considered fixed period employment contracts:
(1) Employed to work in a specific project that is “not normal for the business or trade of the employer, and where the schedule for commencing and ending of work is fixed”; or
(2) Employed in work that is of a “temporary nature that has a fixed schedule for its ending or successful completion of work”; or
(3) Employed to work in “seasonal labor for which employment is engaged during such season.”
Also, the employment under (1), (2) or (3) above must not be longer than two years and the employment contract must be made in writing at the commencement of employment.
Supreme Court decisions have also provided further guidance on the meaning of a fixed period employment contract.  In Supreme Court precedent Nos. 5180/2542 and 10432/2546, the employment contracts in both cases have a clause which provides for either contractual party to have the right to terminate the contract prior to its ending date.  In both cases, the Supreme Court ruled that the employment contract is not a fixed period employment contract.
As a result of the above, the number of cases whereby the employer does not have to pay severance and provide prior notice of employment termination to the employee is reduced.
Tip
Employers need to ensure that their fixed period employment contracts entered into with employees do fall within its legal meaning.  Otherwise, the employment contract may be considered as an ongoing contract and the employer is subjected, upon termination of contract by the employer (not due to employee’s serious misconduct), to pay severance and provide prior notice of employment termination to the employee.
David Tan is a Lecturer of Business Law at Asian University and author of the book “A Primer of Thai Business Law”, available online at www.chulabook.com or by calling 038 233 490 to order.  In Bangkok, the book is available at Asia Books and Kinokuniya bookstores.  Any questions or comments to David should be sent to [email protected]
 


Trade wants government’s security assurance

Watchiranont Thongtep (TTG Asia, Bangkok)
The Thai travel trade is asking for measures on tourist security at Suvarnabhumi Airport to be the government’s priority before re-starting their tactical promotions.
Jetour (Thailand) deputy managing director, Pornsri Visavachaipan said, “We want concrete government measures to assure no one can shut down Thailand’s main gateway airports again.”
Ms Pornsri said even if hotels discounted their room rates to win back tourists, tactical promotions by the agents would not be effective unless international airlines and tourists regain their confidence in the country. So far, she said, new bookings with her company have not increased.
The Association of Thai Travel Agents vice-president and CCT Express managing director, Vichit Prakobkosol said he would tentatively complement and push more direct sales to partners who could keep Thailand’s brochure at their counters.
He added while the flight resumption at Suvarnabhumi Airport would help the industry maintain 30 to 50 percent on suspended bookings until year-end, the trade also needs road shows to regional markets such as China and Taiwan to draw tourists for 2009’s Chinese New Year.
Thai Hotels Association vice-president, Surapong Techaruvichit said estimated average occupancy rate for December might remain around 50 to 60 percent, against 80 to 90 percent received in the same period last year.
The Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) and Airport of Thailand (AoT) also invited foreign diplomats, airline representatives, tour operators and the local and international media for an inspection trip on re-opening day at Suvarnabhumi Airport, in a bid to rebuild the country’s global image.
AoT acting president and Suvarnabhumi Airport general manager, Serirat Prasutanond told TTG Daily News after the re-opening of the airports, the road shows would be discussed soon with TAT, the Ministry of Tourism and Sports, Royal Thai Embassy, Thai Airways and travel trade members.