Pattaya Mail turns 12

Vol. XIII No. 32
Friday August 12 - August 18, 2005

Home
AutoMania
Books-Music
Business News
Columns
Community Happenings
Dining Out & Entertainment
Editorial
Features
Kids Corner
Letters
News
Our Community
Shopping
Social Scene
Sports
Travel
Who's who

Sophon TV-Guide
Clubs in Pattaya

Classifieds

Search
All Back Issues

Pattaya Mail
About Us
Subscribe
Advertising Rates


Fun City By The Sea

Updated every Friday
by Saichon Paewsoongnern

 



 

COLUMNS
HEADLINES [click on headline to view story]:

Money matters

Snap Shots

Modern Medicine

Learn to Live to Learn

Heart to Heart with Hillary

Psychological Perspectives

Money matters: A short history of nearly every fiat currency

Part 1

Graham Macdonald
MBMG International Ltd.

Today the so-called “dollar” is deemed by US government fiat to be legal tender in payment for all debts. In other words, the government is saying: “Here, we deem this stuff we print to be money, and it shall be used in payment of all debts.” The meaning of this outrage has been lost through the passage of time through laziness and ignorance. Let us see what the currency markets have to say before I share with you a brief history of how we got to fiat money in the US:

We identify two main drivers for the USD rally through 2005, and in both cases think the effects look rather stretched already. This is NOT to say that this trend won’t continue, but the same old fundamental arguments are reaching maturation:

1) Firstly, the sell off in EUR/USD after the rejection of the EU constitution in France (55%) and Netherlands (62%) is over done. Despite the hysteria about the imminent break-up of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and the demise of the euro, this is only slightly more probable than Texas seceding from the rest of the U.S., given the absence of readily available exits for member states. EU officials failed to quell investors’ concerns by refusing to quash rumours that the Bundesbank and the German Finance Ministry had discussed the possible break-up of the EMU back in mid May. But with the European constitution in its current form now effectively dead and the contentious issue of the EU budget likely to go on the back burner for at least the next six months, the worst of the political “crisis” in the Eurozone is now behind us.

2) Secondly, the U.S. economy’s ability to deliver consistent positive economic surprises relative to the rest of the world is a transitory phenomenon. To measure economic news flow in a more objective manner, Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) Capital Markets has constructed Economic Surprise Indices for the main countries and regions. The indices are based on rolling one-month “windows” of the main activity releases’ outcomes relative to consensus, expressed as diffusion indices. The graph here shows the Eurozone index minus that for the USD against the three-month change in EUR/USD.

From a fundamental viewpoint, the three significant USD bounces in the current bear market have all been associated with the U.S. delivering strongly positive economic surprises relative to the Eurozone. But economic surprises are by their nature transitory - expectations will inevitably catch up with the positive news flow, as was the case in the last two USD bounces. And as this happens, the structural factors that have been driving the USD lower for the last three years come back into play and, in our view, the trend decline resumes.

From a fundamental viewpoint, the three significant USD bounces in the current bear market have all been associated with the US Dollar Index being oversold (as measured by the RSI at the top of the graph).

Intermarket analysis is often a powerful tool utilized by technicians in order to identify key inflection points in various markets and asset classes. The main premise of intermarket analysis is that markets rarely move in isolation to one another.

Therefore, it is often helpful to identify market linkages in order to follow trading themes as they develop and evolve over time. Since the U.S. dollar reached a cyclical peak in 2001, one intermarket theme that has been prevalent has been the negative correlation between the U.S. dollar and the price of gold. This relationship is presented on your left, where the U.S. dollar, as represented by the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY), has been within a long-term downtrend while gold prices have been trending higher. Note that the DXY reached a cyclical low at 80.39 in December 2004 - just as gold prices peaked at 458.70. However, this key intermarket linkage has broken down sharply in recent weeks, as the DXY has risen in tandem with gold prices. Notably, voter rejection of the European constitution in France and the Netherlands in late May has served as the catalyst for this development. The breakdown in this relationship has important implications for the U.S. dollar, which we examine next week.

The above data and research was compiled from sources believed to be reliable. However, neither MBMG International Ltd nor its officers can accept any liability for any errors or omissions in the above article nor bear any responsibility for any losses achieved as a result of any actions taken or not taken as a consequence of reading the above article. For more information please contact Graham Macdonald on [email protected]


Snap Shots: Polar bears and black cats

by Harry Flashman

Have you ever tried to photograph a polar bear? Or a black cat? Or even a white car, or a plain black one? If you use an automatic camera set on A (for “amnesia”) then the chances are very high that you ended up with a grey polar bear and a grey cat. Very highly likely. The reason for this is the magic photographic number known as 18 percent grey!

All photographers should become acquainted with the colour known as 18 percent grey. Why? Because after you understand 18 percent grey, you have complete control over blacks and whites in your photographs - and by that, I mean in colour photography, not just the B&W kind.

The really dedicated photo buffs will recognize 18 percent grey as being the cornerstone of the “Zone System” and Ansel Adams superb prints are trotted out with sage mutterings that if you understood the zone system, then your photos would look like his too. This is, of course, frog spawn. Ansel Adams spent many hours painstakingly printing his B&W work, specifically burning in some areas, holding back others and if you think he didn’t then think again.

However, here is the “short course” on the Zone System. What you have to remember at all times is just the simple fact that the meter in your camera knows intimately what is 18 percent grey, and is programmed to produce as much 18 percent grey as possible. In other words, point the camera at your subject and the meter will work out a combination of shutter speed and aperture to give an exposure to get the whole shot as close to 18 percent grey as possible. This is irrespective of whatever name the camera manufacturer gives to the metering system and how many points it meters from. The common denominator is 18 percent grey.

Now this works for the majority of shots - 18 percent grey is close enough, and the processor at your friendly photoshop can adjust the rest from there - but it is always a compromise. You do not even realise what a compromise it really is until you take a photograph of that aforementioned white car or a black cat, and see that it has been printed grey.

This is one reason why I keep on saying that if you run the camera in the fully A for automatic mode, you will only get A for “average” pictures. What you have to do to get whites or blacks is to run the camera in the metered manual mode instead. Remember that when you are photographing the white car the exposure indicated by the camera is the one that will make the white colour 18 percent grey. To get the colour back to white it will need more light on the film.

Here’s what you do. Let us imagine that your camera tells you that the exposure should be f16 @ 1/60th of a second. You need more light to fall on the emulsion, so make your exposure f 11 @ 1/60th and another at f8 @ 1/60th. That gives you both one and two full stops of light more. One of those two will give you a white car, irrespective of such fancy terms as automated multi-phasic metering, centre weighted metering or whatever.

Now when photographing a black object, the camera meter will indicate a shutter speed and an aperture to give you another 18 percent grey object. There is too much light falling on the film emulsion this time. What you have to do is cut down on the amount of light getting into the camera. Again imagine that the indicated exposure is f16 @ 1/60th. You want to darken things, so take two shots with one at f16 @ 1/125th and another at f16 @ 1/250th. Again this is one and two stops decrease in light levels. One of these will give you a black cat!

Put the camera in metered manual mode and then if you are photographing something white, give it one and two stops more light than indicated. Conversely, if photographing something black, set the camera for one and two stops less light than indicated. It works! Try it this weekend.


Modern Medicine: Is cloning the way forward?

by Dr. Iain Corness, Consultant

There is a movie coming called The Island. This portrays a future direction for mankind, though a rather well-heeled mankind, I have to say. The plot is, that for five million dollars, you can have a clone made of yourself, which is kept safely away from prying eyes or accident, ready to be used when you need the odd organ or three, either through disaster or disease. And while you are lying on the operating table, the new kidney/liver/heart is winging its way to you by helicopter. Great for you, though not quite so great for your clone!

Now that’s the Sci-Fi movie, but has it a chance of being our real future? After all, many concepts that were wild dreams years ago, are reality today. Remember Dick Tracey’s two way wrist radio? The fore-runner to today’s mobile phone. You can add in much more from the annals of science fiction, including space travel, with people floating around in a space station as I type this. So will we all have our own spare parts clone, an (un)willing donor to keep us going? I believe the answer is no.

There are many reasons for my negative feelings, even leaving aside the very vexed question of the ethics of cloning human beings, especially as mobile organ replacements. The first item to consider is whether cloning does indeed produce a “new” you? The simple answer is that it does not. It produces an “old” you. The cells that are taken to produce the clone are already running down their internal time clock. It seems that the “new” cells are already the same distance down the time line as the donor. Simplistic, I know, but it does go some way towards understanding the problems associated with cloning.

One prediction that is true from the movie, is the cost. Cloning is expensive. One reason is high-tech and another is the failure rate. The famous first sheep clone called Dolly was the only success in 276 attempts! Figures indicate that more than 90 percent of cloning attempts fail to produce a viable result, and it takes more than 100 nuclear transfer procedures to produce one viable clone.

Even if the animal survives initially, cloned animals tend to have more compromised immune function and higher rates of infection, tumor growth, and other disorders (Dolly was young when she died of cancer). Japanese studies have shown that cloned mice die early. About a third of the cloned calves born alive die young. Just looking healthy is not a good indicator of long term survival. For example, Australia’s first cloned sheep appeared healthy and energetic on the day she died, and the results from her autopsy failed to determine a cause of death.

Not only do most attempts to clone mammals fail, about 30 percent of clones born alive are affected with “large offspring syndrome”. The same problems would be expected in human cloning. Additionally, what about mental development? These are not important factors in cloning sheep, not the brightest animals in the farmyard, but an important factor in the development of humans.

A more possible way forward could be cloned organs. This requires harvesting stem cells, and producing organs from them. In 2002, scientists with the biotechnology company Advanced Cell Technology reported that they had successfully transplanted kidney-like organs into cows. The researchers created a cloned cow embryo then harvested fetal tissue from the clones and transplanted it into the donor cow. In the three months of observation following the transplant, no sign of immune rejection was observed in the transplant recipient.

Another potential application of cloning is the creation of genetically modified pigs from which organs suitable for human transplants could be harvested (xenotransplantation). Tomorrow’s breakfast order could be bacon and eggs and a little kidney! But that is the stuff of Science Fiction, isn’t it?


Learn to Live to Learn: Postcards from Oxford – Part Two

with Andrew Watson

Still in Oxford. The weather is closing in. Another opportunity then, to spend real time, with real people. Dr Helen Fail is a leading figure in international education, with a global reputation for cutting edge research, particularly in the area of Third Culture Kids (TCK’s). I was lucky to be able to snatch a few moments with her over tea and biscuits, as the rain continued to lash down outside.

AW: Why education, Helen?

Dr. Helen Fail: “On the Lord’s Side”

HF: I suppose it comes down to a desire to influence, shape and change people’s perceptions and understanding of things.

AW: That puts the teacher in a pretty powerful position?

HF: Yes, there’s a feeling of power because you have a voice. In a sense, people are listening to a certain perspective which they can either accept or reject. You have the opportunity to express your perception and understanding on whatever the subject may be.

AW: Can you expand a little on your desire to “influence, shape and change people’s perceptions and understanding”?

HF: Yes. I’ll give you an example. I started as a language teacher, enabling people to communicate and understand and relate to the world in a different way by giving them language tools. In this way, they were able to see and understand things differently, in a way that they couldn’t see before. One of the things I’ve realised is that the things I’ve wanted to communicate have changed. For example, once I started learning about TCKs, I realised that this way of understanding myself helped me to make decisions about my life and career. Then, I wanted to empower other people in the same way. So, by helping teachers, parents and kids understand the concept, I was giving them the power to change their reaction to their life experiences.

AW: Regarding terrorism, how does the desire to influence, shape and change people’s perceptions and understanding of things differ from the aims of Islamic fundamentalism?

HF: I guess the difference between teaching and indoctrination is that, (thinks) what you want is for people to think, read and reflect for themselves. Certainly from a Christian perspective, people make up their own mind and are invited to engage with a concept or theory. Religious education in Britain, for example, is about teaching about world religions without proselytizing.

AW: Tony Blair talks about “evil ideologies”. What’s your position?

HF: The Muslim response is to draw a line between Islam and fundamentalists talking about jihad. The actions of a minority result in bad press for Islam. I once wrote an article in upstate New York, which I thought nobody would ever read, about what I really thought about the situation in Israel. (Helen and I worked at the same school in Jerusalem, although not at the same time). People used to ask, “Whose side are you on?” To which my response is, “The Lord’s side”. It’s not black and white. There are so many greys.

AW: Do you think an educationalist can be equated with an evangelist?

HF: No, because the difference is in persuasion. The difference between coercing you to adapt your view and asking you to make up your own mind. Yes, I influence and try and persuade and of course there’s a danger that teachers can abuse their position by persuasion. Teaching, to me, is about introducing knowledge and information in order to elicit a personal response but it’s also about respecting someone’s free choice. For example, I can tell or advise a teenage girl about contraception but I cannot force her to use it.

AW: So what if you were teaching a student who supported the suicide bombers and aspired to emulate them? How do you teach a potential “martyr” that he or she shouldn’t do it?

HF: I think you’d no longer be in a purely teaching role. If you knew a student was like that you’d have to take on a mentoring role and ask them to question those areas where they’d received indoctrination.

AW: Did you travel by bus in Jerusalem when bombings were going on?

HF: Yes. The last time I went home in the bus I was with a student in Grade 7 and she said to me, “I’m really surprised you’ve come on the bus. Everyone else is too scared.” I asked her if she was afraid and she said that she was. But her mother had told her to pray and not to be afraid.

[email protected]
Next week: Postcard from Oxford part 3.


Heart to Heart with Hillary

Dear Hillary,
I have provided for my wife for the past six years of our marriage. I have provided for her family as well, building a small house on the farm. She has never had to want for anything. I am a model husband, good looking, never play up, only drink in moderation, in perfect health, a witty intelligent companion, and considered by everyone as a “good catch”. This week she calmly announced that she wants a divorce. I can’t get it out of her as to why - just that she wants a divorce. Why, Hillary, why? I have given her no cause for this. I am really astounded by her actions. Do you have any ideas?
Astounded

Dear Astounded,
Yes, I have lots of ideas. Firstly, it’s probably because she has found out after six years that she is married to a smug self satisfied, arrogant, pompous twit. I think I’d divorce you too, but it wouldn’t have taken me six years.
Dear Hillary,
This isn’t really a heart problem, but is one that worries me every day. We are often in Thailand and the one thing that completely confuses me is the subject of tipping - when and how much? If the establishment charges a “service fee”, should you tip as well? What do you do as someone living there, for example? I believe that the wages are not high for some of the people in bars and restaurants and they need the tips, but I do not want to throw money away either? What’s your tip about tipping?
Penny

Dear Penny,
There are many factors to take into consideration here. Firstly, Service Charge or no Service Charge. If the establishment adds on 10 percent (the usual amount), then as far as Hillary is concerned - that’s the tip. There are some places that no doubt pocket the Service Charge, but that’s not anything of your doing, nor can you change it. That is something between the employees and the owners to work out. However, if Hillary feels that the waiter or service provider has gone well beyond that which could be expected, then I reward with a little extra something for that person, irrespective. You know the sort of things I like - a little fawning, groveling, heavy handed refilling of the wine glasses, complimentary chocolates at the end of the meal and lots of compliments.
In an establishment that has no standard add on Service Charge, then it really is up to you. Small change left over or up to 10 percent is quite normal. The Thai people are grateful for anything you leave them. It all adds up by the end of the day.
By the way, if you leave the change (tip) on the plate, this means the tip should go into the tip box and shared amongst all personnel. If you place the tip in the service person’s hand, then the tip is all theirs. This is particularly so in the bars, so remember.
Dear Hillary,
Where would you suggest I take my girlfriend for a quiet romantic evening? I intend to propose to her then, so want the surroundings to make it an evening to remember. Have you any suggestions?
Soon to be Married

Dear Soon to be Married,
You didn’t say in your email just what it was that you wanted to propose to the young lady. Marriage, m้nage a trois or a dirty weekend in Chiang Rai? If you are so indecisive and wishy washy as this all the time, I hope she says No! to all three of your proposals. Really, my palpitating Petal, you should know your girlfriend’s taste more than I do (I’ve never met her I am sure, and as far tasting...)? Take her to someplace where she is happy and enjoys the surroundings and go from there. Best of luck!
Dear Hillary,
You are forever telling people that they live in Thailand and should learn Thai if they are living here for some time. I have retired here, but at my age (62), I find it very difficult to learn a new language. Is there any quick way of doing this, or do you have any special tips for people trying to learn this Thai language? I can assure you this question is genuine and a genuine answer is appreciated.
Jim

Dear Jim,
Yes, Petal, I do have to remind many expats that this is not their country, so why should the locals have to learn your language? I also realize that for many expats, Thai is a difficult language to learn, as it is not derived from Latin roots like so many European languages. Try and find a good language school in your area (ask around fellow expats), and then go and learn written as well as spoken Thai. I know that many of you will say, “We just want to be able to speak it,” but by learning the script, it gives you a greater understanding of the sounds, which is the all important factor with the Thai language. And it certainly makes it easier when traveling up-country, to know which direction you are headed! It is worth the effort, Petal. Try for six months at an hour a day. And do the homework!


Psychological Perspectives:  What makes us the way we are?

by Michael Catalanello, Ph.D.

Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra recently appeared alongside former Prime Minister and chairman of the National Reconciliation Commission (NRC) Anand Panyarachun in a televised interview to discuss their respective approaches to the political unrest and violence in the Southern Provinces of Yala, Pattani, and Narathiwat. Mr. Anand has proposed strategies for building trust and reconciliation between the government and local Muslim communities. Prime Minister Thaksin has promoted a tougher stance, emphasizing the use of policing tactics to quell the violence.

It was interesting to notice the stark contrasts between these two Thai leaders. While both men have risen to positions of national and international prominence, their respective personal styles, their politics, and their approaches to the challenges posed by the situation in the South appear fundamentally different.

We usually take it for granted that people exhibit distinctive differences from one another in many of the attitudes that they hold, in their social behavior, and in the way they respond to events. Psychologists use the term personality to refer to an individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting.

Numerous theories of personality have gone in and out of fashion during the 100 or so years since Freud proposed the first comprehensive theory of personality. Theorists have proposed personality traits such as introversion and extraversion to try to capture the individual differences we attribute to personality. Even attitudes that underlie different political persuasions like those of Anand and Thaksin have been tied to personality characteristics.

Psychologists who study personality have generally attempted to narrow the number of personality traits to a minimum, while still capturing the rich variety of personality styles found among humans. They have worked to develop valid and reliable instruments to measure those traits, and have looked for relationships among the proposed traits and the behavior of those possessing them.

When we think of all the ways people can vary in personality, the question arises as to the origins of these differences. How do we account for the fact that some people seem much more conventional in their thinking, while others exhibit a great deal of originality? Why do some people crave adventure and risk, while others routinely appear more cautious? Why do some people characteristically exhibit hostility and aggressiveness, while others seem more even-tempered and sociable in their relationships?

Answers to these questions are usually variations on the theme of “nature versus nurture.” Our attitudes, emotions, and behavior are influenced by our biological nature, by our experiences in life, and by interactions between the two. Differences of opinions usually revolve around the relative importance attributable to heredity versus the environment.

Psychologists have traditionally emphasized environmental influences on behavior. Since personality differences appear to begin to emerge very early in life, a major focus was placed upon early childhood experiences, relationships with parents, and exposure to early trauma. Recent research, however, has suggested that heredity plays a much more important role than previously imagined.

In order to sort out personality differences attributable to heredity versus environment, psychologists typically study twins. They select samples of identical and fraternal twins raised together, as well as those raised apart. Identical twins raised together share a common genetic make-up, and similar upbringing. Measured differences in their personalities can serve as a baseline for comparing differences found between identical twins reared apart, fraternal twins reared together, and fraternal twins reared apart.

Psychologist Auke Tellegen and his colleagues at the University of Minnesota reported on a very well-designed investigation of this type in 1988. Results indicated that the effects of environmental factors upon most measures of personality appeared negligible. Genes, it appeared, were the primary determinants of personality differences. These findings, contrary to widely held beliefs at the time, are, nevertheless, consistent with other studies of personality differences using twins.

Investigations of this sort typically reveal some pretty amazing parallels between the lives of identical twins raised apart and in isolation from one another, in terms of similar interests, habits, family, and career paths. In one particularly remarkable example, a set of identical twins born in Trinidad were separated shortly after birth. One was taken to Germany where he was raised Catholic and exposed to Nazism. The other was raised in Trinidad as a Jew.

When reunited by researchers in their late forties, both men appeared for the study wearing blue double-breasted suits, mustaches and wire-rimmed glasses. They exhibited similar gestures and mannerisms. Both had a taste for spicy foods and sweet liqueurs. They had a habit of flushing the toilet before using it, liked to dip buttered toast into coffee, and enjoyed sneezing in elevators to startle others.

The conclusion that genetic factors are a prominent determinant of personality may be disappointing to those psychologists who devote their lives to studying the effects of environmental variables like child-rearing practices, socioeconomic status, and parental educational status. Compared to the influence of our genes, it appears that environmental factors amount to small potatoes when it comes to shaping our personalities.

Dr. Catalanello is a licensed psychologist in his home State of Louisiana, USA, and a member of the Faculty of Liberal Arts at Asian University, Chonburi. You may address questions and comments to him at [email protected], or post on his weblog at http://asianupsych.blogspot.com


News | Business | Features | Columns | Mail Bag | Sports | Auto Mania
Our Children | Travel | Our Community | Dining Out & Entertainment
Social Scene | Classifieds | Community Happenings | Books Music Movies
Clubs in Pattaya | Sports Round-Up


E-mail: [email protected]
Pattaya Mail Publishing Co.Ltd.
62/284-286 Thepprasit Road, (Between Soi 6 & 8) Moo 12, Pattaya City
T. Nongprue, A. Banglamung,
Chonburi 20150 Thailand
Tel.66-38 411 240-1, 413 240-1, Fax:66-38 427 596

Copyright © 2004 Pattaya Mail. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Speak German Confidently and Naturally in Less Than 3 Months! Click Here